Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Data availability eGon2037 #297

Open
CarlosEpia opened this issue Aug 6, 2024 · 14 comments
Open

Data availability eGon2037 #297

CarlosEpia opened this issue Aug 6, 2024 · 14 comments
Assignees

Comments

@CarlosEpia
Copy link

CarlosEpia commented Aug 6, 2024

In this issue, it will be documented which data is available in the new version of NEP English and NEP original in case it is decided to a create new scenario eGon2037 mainly based on the code already available for eGon2035.

@CarlosEpia CarlosEpia self-assigned this Aug 6, 2024
@CarlosEpia
Copy link
Author

CarlosEpia commented Aug 6, 2024

From the scenario_parameters this information was used from NEP for eGon2035 and would be also required to eGon2037:
NEP original table 33 and text above (biomass is still not available):
"fuel_costs": {
"oil": 73.8, # [EUR/MWh]
"gas": 25.6, # [EUR/MWh]
"coal": 20.2, # [EUR/MWh]
"lignite": 4.0, # [EUR/MWh]
"nuclear": 1.7, # [EUR/MWh]
"biomass": 40, # Dummyvalue, ToDo: Find a suitable source
},
NEP original table 34
"co2_costs": 76.5, # [EUR/t_CO2]
NEP original table 35
"co2_emissions": { # Netzentwicklungsplan Strom 2035, Version 2021, 1. Entwurf, p. 40, table 8
"waste": 0.165, # [t_CO2/MW_th]
"lignite": 0.393, # [t_CO2/MW_th]
"gas": 0.201, # [t_CO2/MW_th]
"nuclear": 0.0, # [t_CO2/MW_th]
"oil": 0.288, # [t_CO2/MW_th]
"coal": 0.335, # [t_CO2/MW_th]
"other_non_renewable": 0.268, # [t_CO2/MW_th]
},

@CarlosEpia
Copy link
Author

Overnight costs:
It is mentioned here and here that the cost for overhead HV transmission lines and transformers comes from the NEP. This NEP chapter 5.2.1 links this document regarding most of the overnight cost.
parameters["overnight_cost"] = {
"ac_ehv_overhead_line": 2.5e6
/ (
2
* parameters["electrical_parameters"]["ac_line_380kV"]["s_nom"]
), # [EUR/km/MW]
"ac_ehv_cable": 11.5e6
/ (
2
* parameters["electrical_parameters"]["ac_cable_380kV"][
"s_nom"
]
), # [EUR/km/MW]
"ac_hv_overhead_line": 0.06e6
/ parameters["electrical_parameters"]["ac_line_110kV"][
"s_nom"
], # [EUR/km/MW]
"ac_hv_cable": 0.8e6
/ parameters["electrical_parameters"]["ac_cable_110kV"][
"s_nom"
], # [EUR/km/MW]
"dc_overhead_line": 0.5e3, # [EUR/km/MW]
"dc_cable": 3.25e3, # [EUR/km/MW]
"dc_inverter": 0.3e6, # [EUR/MW]
"transformer_380_110": 17.33e3, # [EUR/MVA]
"transformer_380_220": 13.33e3, # [EUR/MVA]
"transformer_220_110": 17.5e3, # [EUR/MVA]
"battery inverter": read_costs(
costs, "battery inverter", "investment"
),
"battery storage": read_costs(
costs, "battery storage", "investment"
),
}

@CarlosEpia
Copy link
Author

CarlosEpia commented Aug 7, 2024

e-mobility:
There is a lot of information like this FfE study about electric mobility in the NEP 2023. I still don´t see exactly the data used below but in this document table 6 we see similar data.
if scenario == "eGon2035":
parameters = {
"motorized_individual_travel": {
"NEP C 2035": {
"ev_count": 15100000,
"bev_mini_share": 0.1589,
"bev_medium_share": 0.3533,
"bev_luxury_share": 0.1053,
"phev_mini_share": 0.0984,
"phev_medium_share": 0.2189,
"phev_luxury_share": 0.0652,
"model_parameters": {},
}
}
}

TODO: find out if this % are coming from NEP or which source. Check eGon final report.

@CarlosEpia
Copy link
Author

CarlosEpia commented Aug 7, 2024

Regarding scenario capacities all the installed capacities per scenario and carrier can be found here chapter 2.1.2 table 1 page 25 and page 52

@CarlosEpia
Copy link
Author

Regarding Wind offshore, the information accuracy improved significantly and we can now know the connexion point of each one of the wind offshore parks. All information available in chapter 4

@CarlosEpia
Copy link
Author

TODO: Compare installed capacities from 2035 vs 2037 (also scenarios)

@CarlosEpia
Copy link
Author

Values for installed capacities different scenarios:

<title></title>
<meta name="generator" content="LibreOffice 7.3.7.2 (Linux)"/>
<style type="text/css">
	body,div,table,thead,tbody,tfoot,tr,th,td,p { font-family:"Liberation Sans"; font-size:x-small }
	a.comment-indicator:hover + comment { background:#ffd; position:absolute; display:block; border:1px solid black; padding:0.5em;  } 
	a.comment-indicator { background:red; display:inline-block; border:1px solid black; width:0.5em; height:0.5em;  } 
	comment { display:none;  } 
</style>
Energieträger Referenz 2037 2037 2037 2045 2045 2045   2019 2035 2035 2035 2040
  2020/2021 A B C A B C     A B C B
Kernenergie 4.1 0 0 0 0 0 0   8.1 0 0 0 0
Braunkohle 18.9 0 0 0 0 0 0   20.9 7.8 0 0 0
Steinkohle 19 0 0 0 0 0 0   22.6 0 0 0 0
Erdgas/Wasserstoff* 32.1 38.4 38.4 38.4 34.6 34.6 34.6   30 38.1 42.4 46.7 42.4
Öl 4.7 0 0 0 0 0 0   4.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.1
Pumpspeicher 9.8 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2   9.8 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2
sonstige konventionelle Erzeugung 4.3 1 1 1 1 1 1   4.3 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.7
onshore 56.1 158.2 158.2 161.6 160 160 180   53.3 81.5 86.8 90.9 88.8
offshore 7.8 50.5 58.5 58.5 70 70 70   7.5 28 30 34 40
Photovoltaik 59.3 345.4 345.4 345.4 400 400 445   49 110.2 117.8 120.1 125.8
Biomasse 9.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 2 2 2   8.3 6.8 7.5 8.7 8.2
Wasserkraft*** 4.9 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3   4.8 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6
sonstige 1.1 1 1 1 1 1 1   1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
Summe regenerative Erzeugung 138.7 564.9 572.9 576.3 638.3 638.3 703.3   124.2 233.4 249 260.6 269.7
Summe 231.6 616.5 624.5 627.9 686.1 686.1 751.1   224.3 294.6 306.7 322.6 327.1

@CarlosEpia
Copy link
Author

Absolute [GW] and relative difference in installed capacities for different scenarios:
**

<title></title>
<meta name="generator" content="LibreOffice 7.3.7.2 (Linux)"/>
<style type="text/css">
	body,div,table,thead,tbody,tfoot,tr,th,td,p { font-family:"Liberation Sans"; font-size:x-small }
	a.comment-indicator:hover + comment { background:#ffd; position:absolute; display:block; border:1px solid black; padding:0.5em;  } 
	a.comment-indicator { background:red; display:inline-block; border:1px solid black; width:0.5em; height:0.5em;  } 
	comment { display:none;  } 
</style>
  2035A – 2037A 2035B – 2037B 2035C – 2037C
Kernenergie 0 0 0
Braunkohle 7.8 (100%) 0 0
Steinkohle 0 0 0
Erdgas -0.3 (-0.7%) 4 (9.4%) 8.3 (17.7%)
Öl 1.3 (100%) 1.3 (100%) 1.3 (100%)
Pumpspeicher -2 (-19.6%) -2 (-19.6%) -2 (-19.6%)
sonstige konventionelle Erzeugung 2.8 (73.6%) 2.8 (73.6%) 2.8 (73.6%)
Wind onshore -76.7 (-94.1%) -71.4 (-82.2%) -70.7 (-77.7%)
Wind offshore -22.5 (-80.3%) -28.5 (-95%) -24.5 (-72%)
Photovoltaik -235.2 (-213.4%) -227.6 (-193.2%) -225.3 (-187.5%)
Biomasse 2.3 (33.8%) 3 (40%) 4.2 (48.2%)
Wasserkraft 0.3 (5.3%) 0.3 (5.3%) 0.3 (5.3%)
sonstige regenerative Erzeugung 0.3 (23%) 0.3 (23%) 0.3 (23%)
Summe regenerative Erzeugung -331.5 (-142%) -323.9 (-130%) -315.7 (-121.1%)
Summe Erzeugung -321.9 (-109.2%) -317.8 (-103.6%) -305.3 (-94.6%)
**

@CarlosEpia
Copy link
Author

Fuel and CO2 costs:

<title></title>
<meta name="generator" content="LibreOffice 7.3.7.2 (Linux)"/>
<style type="text/css">
	body,div,table,thead,tbody,tfoot,tr,th,td,p { font-family:"Liberation Sans"; font-size:x-small }
	a.comment-indicator:hover + comment { background:#ffd; position:absolute; display:block; border:1px solid black; padding:0.5em;  } 
	a.comment-indicator { background:red; display:inline-block; border:1px solid black; width:0.5em; height:0.5em;  } 
	comment { display:none;  } 
</style>
fuel_costs   2035 2037 ABC Diff [%] Note
oil [EUR/MWh] 73.8 24.9 -66.3  
gas [EUR/MWh] 25.6 15.2 -40.6  
coal [EUR/MWh] 20.2 6.1 -69.8  
lignite [EUR/MWh] 4 6.5 62.5  
nuclear [EUR/MWh] 1.7 1.7 0.0  
biomass [EUR/MWh] 40 40 0.0 Dummyvalue
co2_cost          
co2_costs [EUR/t_CO2] 76.5 176.2 130.3  
co2_emissions          
waste [t_CO2/MW_th] 0.165 0.165 0.0  
lignite [t_CO2/MW_th] 0.393 0.393 0.0  
gas [t_CO2/MW_th] 0.201 0.201 0.0  
nuclear [t_CO2/MW_th] 0 0 0.0  
oil [t_CO2/MW_th] 0.288 0.286 -0.7  
coal [t_CO2/MW_th] 0.335 0.377 12.5  
other_non_renewable [t_CO2/MW_th] 0.268   -100.0 No value found

@CarlosEpia
Copy link
Author

Total demand comparison. The information was grouped differently in the 2 documents, so no all the values can be compared directly:

<title></title>
<meta name="generator" content="LibreOffice 7.3.7.2 (Linux)"/>
<style type="text/css">
	body,div,table,thead,tbody,tfoot,tr,th,td,p { font-family:"Liberation Sans"; font-size:x-small }
	a.comment-indicator:hover + comment { background:#ffd; position:absolute; display:block; border:1px solid black; padding:0.5em;  } 
	a.comment-indicator { background:red; display:inline-block; border:1px solid black; width:0.5em; height:0.5em;  } 
	comment { display:none;  } 
</style>
  2035A 2035B 2035C 2037A 2037B 2037C Diff A Diff B Diff C
Verarbeitendes Gewerbe 217.2 211.8 205.7 256 295.1 286 -38.8 (-17.8%) -83.3 (-39.3%) -80.3 (-39%)
Haushalt 121.5 118.5 115.1 134.4 157 166 -12.9 (-10.6%) -38.5 (-32.4%) -50.9 (-44.2%)
GHD 130.4 127.1 123.5 154.3 187.8 215.7 -23.9 (-18.3%) -60.7 (-47.7%) -92.2 (-74.6%)
Verkehr (ohne Elektromobilität) 16 16 16 13.6 21 21 2.4 (15%) -5 (-31.2%) -5 (-31.2%)
Umwandlungssektor (Kohle, Erdgas,Öl) 5.4 4.1 4.1       5.4 (100%) 4.1 (100%) 4.1 (100%)
Nettostromverbrauch zzgl. Verteilnetzverluste** 603.6 620.8 651.2 773.9 938.1 1002.3 -170.3 (-28.2%) -317.3 (-51.1%) -351.1 (-53.9%)

@ClaraBuettner
Copy link

eGon2035 bases on scenario C2035. Could you maybe also add comparisons from that scenario to A und B from the 2037 NEP?

@CarlosEpia
Copy link
Author

eGon2035 bases on scenario C2035. Could you maybe also add comparisons from that scenario to A und B from the 2037 NEP?

Sure. Here it can be seen the difference between all the 2037 scenarios and 2035C for installed capacity and demand. For costs there is just one value per year.

<title></title>
<meta name="generator" content="LibreOffice 7.3.7.2 (Linux)"/>
<style type="text/css">
	body,div,table,thead,tbody,tfoot,tr,th,td,p { font-family:"Liberation Sans"; font-size:x-small }
	a.comment-indicator:hover + comment { background:#ffd; position:absolute; display:block; border:1px solid black; padding:0.5em;  } 
	a.comment-indicator { background:red; display:inline-block; border:1px solid black; width:0.5em; height:0.5em;  } 
	comment { display:none;  } 
</style>
  2035C – 2037A 2035C – 2037B 2035C – 2037C
Kernenergie 0 0 0
Braunkohle 0 0 0
Steinkohle 0 0 0
Erdgas 8.3 (17.7%) 8.3 (17.7%) 8.3 (17.7%)
Öl 1.3 (100%) 1.3 (100%) 1.3 (100%)
Pumpspeicher -2 (-19.6%) -2 (-19.6%) -2 (-19.6%)
sonstige konventionelle Erzeugung 2.8 (73.6%) 2.8 (73.6%) 2.8 (73.6%)
Wind onshore -67.3 (-74%) -67.3 (-74%) -70.7 (-77.7%)
Wind offshore -16.5 (-48.5%) -24.5 (-72%) -24.5 (-72%)
Photovoltaik -225.3 (-187.5%) -225.3 (-187.5%) -225.3 (-187.5%)
Biomasse 4.2 (48.2%) 4.2 (48.2%) 4.2 (48.2%)
Wasserkraft 0.3 (5.3%) 0.3 (5.3%) 0.3 (5.3%)
sonstige regenerative Erzeugung 0.3 (23%) 0.3 (23%) 0.3 (23%)
Summe regenerative Erzeugung -304.3 (-116.7%) -312.3 (-119.8%) -315.7 (-121.1%)
Summe Erzeugung -293.9 (-91.1%) -301.9 (-93.5%) -305.3 (-94.6%)
<title></title>
<meta name="generator" content="LibreOffice 7.3.7.2 (Linux)"/>
<style type="text/css">
	body,div,table,thead,tbody,tfoot,tr,th,td,p { font-family:"Liberation Sans"; font-size:x-small }
	a.comment-indicator:hover + comment { background:#ffd; position:absolute; display:block; border:1px solid black; padding:0.5em;  } 
	a.comment-indicator { background:red; display:inline-block; border:1px solid black; width:0.5em; height:0.5em;  } 
	comment { display:none;  } 
</style>
  2035A 2035B 2035C 2037A 2037B 2037C 2035C – 2037A 2035C – 2037B 2035C – 2037C
Verarbeitendes Gewerbe 217.2 211.8 205.7 256 295.1 286 -50.3 (-24.4%) -89.4 (-43.4%) -80.3 (-39%)
Haushalt 121.5 118.5 115.1 134.4 157 166 -19.3 (-16.7%) -41.9 (-36.4%) -50.9 (-44.2%)
GHD 130.4 127.1 123.5 154.3 187.8 215.7 -30.8 (-24.9%) -64.3 (-52%) -92.2 (-74.6%)
Verkehr (ohne Elektromobilität) 16 16 16 13.6 21 21 2.4 (15%) -5 (-31.2%) -5 (-31.2%)
Umwandlungssektor (Kohle, Erdgas,Öl) 5.4 4.1 4.1       4.1 (100%) 4.1 (100%) 4.1 (100%)
Nettostromverbrauch zzgl. Verteilnetzverluste** 603.6 620.8 651.2 773.9 938.1 1002.3 -122.7 (-18.8%) -286.9 (-44%) -351.1 (-53.9%)

@ClaraBuettner
Copy link

According to figure 5 on page 28 (https://www.netzentwicklungsplan.de/sites/default/files/2023-07/NEP_2037_2045_V2023_2_Entwurf_Teil1_1.pdf) the demands of households and CTS include heat pumps. We model them separately so we should take the data from figure 5 in rows called "davon Geräte"

@ClaraBuettner
Copy link

Somehow I can not find the same demand values, the figure mentioned above lists other values. Do you remember where you found the data for demands?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants