Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

It seems the pipe.UNIPipe ... do not work anymore, is it necessary to maintain two types of pipe outcomes? #1396

Closed
yzztin opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@yzztin
Copy link
Contributor

yzztin commented Jan 3, 2025

Description of the bug | 错误描述

It seems the pipe.UNIPipe ... do not work anymore, such as the error Unresolved attribute reference 'pdf_bytes' for class 'UNIPipe' . And I've observed that there are two types of pipe outcomes. Is it necessary to maintain both?

How to reproduce the bug | 如何复现

Becasue of the pipe.UNIPipe ... do not work anymore, projects like web_api seems outdate.

Operating system | 操作系统

Linux

Python version | Python 版本

3.10

Software version | 软件版本 (magic-pdf --version)

0.10.x

Device mode | 设备模式

cuda

@yzztin yzztin added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 3, 2025
@yzztin
Copy link
Contributor Author

yzztin commented Jan 3, 2025

Thank you for the reminder! I tested the web_api and funcs like get_content_list in the dev branch, and it worked perfectly. @myhloli

@yzztin yzztin closed this as completed Jan 3, 2025
@dt-yy dt-yy added question Further information is requested and removed bug Something isn't working labels Jan 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants