-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
raunak/addNpmTesting #150
raunak/addNpmTesting #150
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes enhance the GitHub Actions workflows by introducing a new "Fork Deploy Test" job for deployment validation in forked environments and improving error handling through artifact preservation on failures. The Foundry toolchain has been upgraded, and naming conventions have been updated for clarity. Collectively, these modifications strengthen the deployment process, ensuring better maintainability and robustness. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant GitHub Actions
participant Deployment Script
participant Binding Artifacts
User->>GitHub Actions: Trigger Deployment
GitHub Actions->>Deployment Script: Execute Fork Deploy Test
Deployment Script->>Contracts: Deploy Contracts with KEY_DEPLOYER
Contracts-->>Deployment Script: Confirm Deployment
Deployment Script-->>GitHub Actions: Deployment Results
GitHub Actions-->>User: Notify Deployment Success
GitHub Actions->>Binding Artifacts: Upload on Failure
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 9
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (13)
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml (1 hunks)
- README.md (3 hunks)
- specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml (2 hunks)
- specs/contracts.spec.yaml (3 hunks)
- specs/evm.accounts.yaml (1 hunks)
- specs/update.spec.yaml (7 hunks)
- specs/upgrade.spec.yaml (2 hunks)
- src/deploy.ts (1 hunks)
- src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts (3 hunks)
- src/updateContract.ts (1 hunks)
- src/utils/io.ts (3 hunks)
- test/Fork/Dispatcher.deploy.t.sol (3 hunks)
- test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- README.md
Additional context used
yamllint
specs/evm.accounts.yaml
[error] 11-11: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml
[error] 13-13: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 23-23: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/upgrade.spec.yaml
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 30-30: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 32-32: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/update.spec.yaml
[error] 134-134: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 143-143: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 152-152: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 154-154: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 156-156: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 161-161: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 171-171: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
Additional comments not posted (39)
.github/workflows/foundry.yml (1)
30-42
: LGTM! Ensure environment variables are correctly set.The new job for fork deployment testing is well-defined. Ensure that the environment variables are correctly set in the GitHub secrets.
src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts (5)
17-17
: LGTM! Variable renaming approved.The variable
upgradeSpecs
has been renamed toupdateSpecs
to reflect a change in terminology.
29-29
: LGTM! Asynchronous handling approved.The
await
keyword ensures that the process waits for the completion of contract updates before proceeding.
32-32
: LGTM! Asynchronous handling approved.The
await
keyword ensures that the process waits for the completion of contract updates before proceeding.
48-48
: LGTM! Environment variables handling approved.The environment variables are properly set using the spread operator.
55-55
: LGTM! Asynchronous handling approved.The
await
keyword ensures that the termination of the anvil process is handled asynchronously.specs/contracts.spec.yaml (8)
23-23
: LGTM! Deployer field update approved.The deployer field has been updated from 'KEY_POLYMER' to 'KEY_DEPLOYER'.
28-28
: LGTM! Deployer field update approved.The deployer field has been updated from 'KEY_POLYMER' to 'KEY_DEPLOYER'.
33-33
: LGTM! Deployer field update approved.The deployer field has been updated from 'KEY_POLYMER' to 'KEY_DEPLOYER'.
43-43
: LGTM! Deployer field update approved.The deployer field has been updated from 'KEY_POLYMER' to 'KEY_DEPLOYER'.
48-48
: LGTM! Deployer field update approved.The deployer field has been updated from 'KEY_POLYMER' to 'KEY_DEPLOYER'.
61-61
: LGTM! Deployer field update approved.The deployer field has been updated from 'KEY_POLYMER' to 'KEY_DEPLOYER'.
66-66
: LGTM! Deployer field update approved.The deployer field has been updated from 'KEY_POLYMER' to 'KEY_DEPLOYER'.
74-74
: LGTM! Deployer field update approved.The deployer field has been updated from 'KEY_POLYMER' to 'KEY_DEPLOYER'.
test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml (8)
23-23
: LGTM!The
deployer
key forLightClient
has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
.
28-28
: LGTM!The
deployer
key forIbc
has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
.
33-33
: LGTM!The
deployer
key forIbcUtils
has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
.
43-43
: LGTM!The
deployer
key forDispatcher
has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
.
48-48
: LGTM!The
deployer
key forFeeVault
has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
.
61-61
: LGTM!The
deployer
key forDispatcherProxy
has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
.
66-66
: LGTM!The
deployer
key forUC
has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
.
74-74
: LGTM!The
deployer
key forUCProxy
has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
.src/updateContract.ts (1)
44-44
: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
updateContractsForChain
are correctly utilizing the updatedenv
initialization.specs/update.spec.yaml (10)
38-41
: LGTM!The entity
LightClient
has been renamed toOptimisticProofVerifier
and thedeployer
key has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
.
45-48
: LGTM!The new entity
OptimisticLightClient
has been added with thedeployer
key set toKEY_DEPLOYER
.
57-57
: LGTM!The
deployer
key forDummyLightClient
has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
.
62-62
: LGTM!The
deployer
key forIbc
has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
.
67-67
: LGTM!The
deployer
key forIbcUtils
has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
.
77-77
: LGTM!The
deployer
key forDispatcher
has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
.
82-82
: LGTM!The
deployer
key forFeeVault
has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
.
95-95
: LGTM!The
deployer
key forDispatcherProxy
has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
.
100-100
: LGTM!The
deployer
key forUC
has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
.
108-108
: LGTM!The
deployer
key forUCProxy
has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
.src/deploy.ts (1)
190-190
: LGTM! But verify the usage of theenv
variable.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that the
env
variable is used correctly throughout the codebase and does not introduce any security or performance issues.Verification successful
LGTM! The usage of the
env
variable is appropriate.The
env
variable is extensively used across the codebase for deployment and update processes. The spread operator ensures that all necessary environment variables are included. No security or performance issues were found.
src/updateContract.ts
src/deploy.ts
src/utils/io.ts
src/tx.ts
src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `env` variable. # Test: Search for the usage of the `env` variable. Expect: No security or performance issues. rg --type python -A 5 $'env'Length of output: 58
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `env` variable in TypeScript files. # Test: Search for the usage of the `env` variable. Expect: No security or performance issues. rg --type ts -A 5 'env'Length of output: 16244
test/Fork/Dispatcher.deploy.t.sol (3)
45-45
: LGTM!The change to include an
address owner
field in theChainAddresses
struct simplifies the handling of the owner's address.
60-60
: LGTM!The change to initialize the
addresses
struct with the owner's address pulled from the environment variable usingvm.envAddress("OwnerAddress")
improves clarity.
69-69
: LGTM!The change to use
vm.prank(addresses.owner)
andvm.startPrank(addresses.owner)
ensures that the correct owner address is used for permission checks.Also applies to: 82-82
src/utils/io.ts (2)
348-349
: LGTM!The addition of the
updateSpecs
variable enhances the function's capability to handle additional specification paths, expanding its configuration flexibility.
Line range hint
365-376
:
LGTM!The inclusion of
updateSpecs
in theaccountConfigFromYaml
object enhances the function's capability to handle additional specification paths.
3233dce
to
6285ec1
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
bun.lockb
is excluded by!**/bun.lockb
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml
6285ec1
to
5bd01fa
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
bun.lockb
is excluded by!**/bun.lockb
Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/bindings.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- package.json
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/bindings.yml (2)
47-53
: LGTM! Ensure the path is correct.The step to upload TypeScript bindings artifacts on error is correctly configured.
However, verify that the path
./src/evm/contracts/
is accurate and contains the expected artifacts.Verification successful
Path verified and correct.
The path
./src/evm/contracts/
exists and contains the expected TypeScript files. The step to upload TypeScript bindings artifacts on error is correctly configured.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the path for TypeScript bindings artifacts. # Test: Check if the path exists and contains TypeScript files. Expect: Path exists and contains TypeScript files. if [ -d "./src/evm/contracts/" ]; then echo "Path exists." ls ./src/evm/contracts/*.ts else echo "Path does not exist." fiLength of output: 1449
53-58
: LGTM! Ensure the path is correct.The step to upload Go bindings artifacts on error is correctly configured.
However, verify that the path
./bindings/
is accurate and contains the expected artifacts.Verification successful
The path
./bindings/
is correct and contains the expected Go bindings artifacts.The
.go
files are organized within subdirectories under./bindings/go/
, confirming that the specified path in the workflow step is accurate.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the path for Go bindings artifacts. # Test: Check if the path exists and contains Go files. Expect: Path exists and contains Go files. if [ -d "./bindings/" ]; then echo "Path exists." ls ./bindings/*.go else echo "Path does not exist." fiLength of output: 145
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all files in the bindings directory to verify its contents. if [ -d "./bindings/" ]; then echo "Path exists." ls -l ./bindings/ else echo "Path does not exist." fiLength of output: 139
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all files in the bindings/go directory to verify its contents. if [ -d "./bindings/go/" ]; then echo "Path exists." ls -l ./bindings/go/ else echo "Path does not exist." fiLength of output: 1266
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Recursively list all .go files in the bindings/go directory to verify its contents. if [ -d "./bindings/go/" ]; then echo "Path exists." find ./bindings/go/ -type f -name "*.go" else echo "Path does not exist." fiLength of output: 1307
b926895
to
10d833c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/bindings.yml (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/bindings.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
bun.lockb
is excluded by!**/bun.lockb
package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/bindings.yml (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/bindings.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
bun.lockb
is excluded by!**/bun.lockb
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/bindings.yml (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/bindings.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
bun.lockb
is excluded by!**/bun.lockb
package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/bindings.yml (2 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- .github/workflows/bindings.yml
- package.json
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/bindings-copy.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
.github/workflows/bindings-copy.yml (5)
1-6
: LGTM!The workflow name and trigger configuration are appropriate.
7-10
: LGTM!The concurrency configuration helps to avoid redundant runs and ensures that only the latest changes are validated.
11-13
: LGTM!The job definition is standard and appropriate for the task.
14-33
: LGTM!The setup steps are necessary and the versions specified are appropriate.
34-65
: LGTM!The binding generation, verification steps, and artifact upload configuration are logical and necessary for ensuring that bindings are up-to-date and for debugging purposes in case of failures.
However, ensure that the artifact upload paths are correct and accessible.
Verification successful
Paths for artifact upload are correct and accessible.
The paths
./src/evm/contracts/
and./bindings/
exist in the repository, ensuring that the artifact upload steps in the GitHub Actions workflow will function as expected.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of artifact upload paths. # Test: Check if the specified paths exist in the repository. Expect: Paths should exist. if [ -d "./src/evm/contracts/" ] && [ -d "./bindings/" ]; then echo "Paths exist." else echo "One or both paths do not exist." exit 1 fiLength of output: 93
8ce4e81
to
33bb865
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (8)
specs/evm.accounts.yaml (2)
3-3
: Remove trailing spaces.Trailing spaces detected on line 3.
- privateKey: '{{ DUMMY_DEPLOYER_PRIVATE_KEY }}' + privateKey: '{{ DUMMY_DEPLOYER_PRIVATE_KEY }}'
11-11
: Remove trailing spaces.Trailing spaces detected on line 11.
- privateKey: '{{ DAPP_PRIVATE_KEY_3 }}' + privateKey: '{{ DAPP_PRIVATE_KEY_3 }}'Tools
yamllint
[error] 11-11: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml (2)
13-13
: Remove trailing spaces.Trailing spaces detected on line 13.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' + deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Tools
yamllint
[error] 13-13: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
23-23
: Remove trailing spaces.Trailing spaces detected on line 23.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' + deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Tools
yamllint
[error] 23-23: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/upgrade.spec.yaml (3)
21-21
: Remove trailing spaces.Trailing spaces detected on line 21.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' + deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Tools
yamllint
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
30-30
: Remove trailing spaces.Trailing spaces detected on line 30.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' + deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Tools
yamllint
[error] 30-30: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
32-32
: Remove trailing spaces.Trailing spaces detected on line 32.
- address: '{{ UCProxy }}' + address: '{{ UCProxy }}'Tools
yamllint
[error] 32-32: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/update.spec.yaml (1)
38-44
: Inconsistent usage of entity name.The entity
LightClient
has not been fully renamed toOptimisticProofVerifier
. The old nameLightClient
is still present in multiple files. Please update the following occurrences:
test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml
:
- Line 1:
- name: LightClient
- Line 2:
description: 'DummyLightClient'
- Line 3:
factoryName: 'DummyLightClient'
specs/update.spec.yaml
:
- Line 1:
- name: OptimisticLightClient
- Line 2:
description: 'OptimisticLightClient'
- Line 3:
factoryName: 'OptimisticLightClient'
- Line 8:
- '{{LightClient}}'
- Line 15:
- '{{LightClient}}'
specs/contracts.spec.yaml
:
- Line 1:
- name: LightClient
- Line 2:
description: 'DummyLightClient'
- Line 3:
factoryName: 'DummyLightClient'
specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml
:
- Line 8:
- '{{LightClient}}'
- Line 15:
- '{{LightClient}}'
Please ensure that all occurrences of
LightClient
are updated toOptimisticProofVerifier
.Analysis chain
Verify the usage of the new entity name.
The entity
LightClient
has been renamed toOptimisticProofVerifier
. Ensure that the new entity name is used consistently throughout the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new entity name `OptimisticProofVerifier`. # Test: Search for the old entity name. Expect: No occurrences of the old name. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'LightClient'Length of output: 2464
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
bun.lockb
is excluded by!**/bun.lockb
Files selected for processing (13)
- .github/workflows/bindings.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml (1 hunks)
- README.md (3 hunks)
- specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml (2 hunks)
- specs/contracts.spec.yaml (3 hunks)
- specs/evm.accounts.yaml (1 hunks)
- specs/update.spec.yaml (7 hunks)
- specs/upgrade.spec.yaml (2 hunks)
- src/deploy.ts (1 hunks)
- src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts (3 hunks)
- src/updateContract.ts (1 hunks)
- test/Fork/Dispatcher.deploy.t.sol (3 hunks)
- test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
- .github/workflows/bindings.yml
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml
- README.md
- specs/contracts.spec.yaml
- src/deploy.ts
- src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts
- src/updateContract.ts
- test/Fork/Dispatcher.deploy.t.sol
- test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml
Additional context used
yamllint
specs/evm.accounts.yaml
[error] 11-11: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml
[error] 13-13: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 23-23: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/upgrade.spec.yaml
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 30-30: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 32-32: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/update.spec.yaml
[error] 134-134: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 143-143: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 152-152: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 154-154: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 156-156: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 161-161: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 171-171: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
Additional comments not posted (10)
specs/evm.accounts.yaml (1)
2-2
: LGTM!The renaming of the account to 'KEY_DEPLOYER' is clear and consistent.
specs/update.spec.yaml (9)
94-95
: Verify the deployer key update.The deployer for
DispatcherProxy
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
. Ensure that this update is correctly reflected throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Verify the deployer key update.
The deployer for
DispatcherProxy
has been successfully updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
across the codebase. No occurrences ofKEY_POLYMER
were found, andKEY_DEPLOYER
is consistently used.
test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml
specs/upgrade.spec.yaml
specs/update.spec.yaml
specs/evm.accounts.yaml
specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml
specs/contracts.spec.yaml
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deployer key update for `DispatcherProxy`. # Test: Search for the old deployer key. Expect: No occurrences of the old key. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deployer key update for `DispatcherProxy`. # Test: Search for the new deployer key. Expect: Occurrences of the new key. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_DEPLOYER'Length of output: 10033
107-108
: Verify the deployer key update.The deployer for
UCProxy
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
. Ensure that this update is correctly reflected throughout the codebase.Verification successful
The deployer key update has been correctly reflected throughout the codebase.
The deployer for
UCProxy
has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
, and this change is consistently applied across multiple YAML files.
specs/update.spec.yaml
specs/upgrade.spec.yaml
test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deployer key update for `UCProxy`. # Test: Search for the old deployer key. Expect: No occurrences of the old key. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deployer key update for `UCProxy`. # Test: Search for the new deployer key to ensure it is correctly used. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_DEPLOYER'Length of output: 10033
76-77
: Verify the deployer key update.The deployer for
Dispatcher
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
. Ensure that this update is correctly reflected throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Verification successful.
The deployer key has been updated from
KEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
consistently across the codebase.
test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml
specs/update.spec.yaml
specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml
specs/contracts.spec.yaml
specs/upgrade.spec.yaml
specs/evm.accounts.yaml
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deployer key update for `Dispatcher`. # Test: Search for the old deployer key. Expect: No occurrences of the old key. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deployer key update for `Dispatcher`. # Test: Search for the new deployer key. Expect: Occurrences of the new key. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_DEPLOYER'Length of output: 10033
61-62
: Verify the deployer key update.The deployer for
Ibc
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
. Ensure that this update is correctly reflected throughout the codebase.Verification successful
The deployer key update has been correctly implemented.
The deployer for
Ibc
has been successfully changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
throughout the codebase.
- Multiple occurrences of
KEY_DEPLOYER
found in various YAML files, includingspecs/update.spec.yaml
.- No occurrences of
KEY_POLYMER
found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deployer key update for `Ibc`. # Test: Search for the old deployer key. Expect: No occurrences of the old key. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deployer key update for `Ibc`. # Test: Search for the new deployer key. Expect: Occurrences of the new key. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_DEPLOYER'Length of output: 10033
99-100
: Verify the deployer key update.The deployer for
UC
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
. Ensure that this update is correctly reflected throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Verification successful.
The deployer key for
UC
has been updated fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
and this change is correctly reflected throughout the codebase.
- Multiple occurrences of
KEY_DEPLOYER
found in relevant YAML files, confirming the update.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deployer key update for `UC`. # Test: Search for the old deployer key. Expect: No occurrences of the old key. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deployer key update for `UC`. # Test: Search for the new deployer key. Expect: Occurrences of the new key. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_DEPLOYER'Length of output: 10033
54-57
: Verify the deployer key update.The deployer for
DummyLightClient
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
. Ensure that this update is correctly reflected throughout the codebase.Verification successful
The deployer key update has been correctly reflected throughout the codebase.
The deployer for
DummyLightClient
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
, and this update is consistently applied across the relevant YAML files.
test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml
specs/upgrade.spec.yaml
specs/contracts.spec.yaml
specs/update.spec.yaml
specs/evm.accounts.yaml
specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deployer key update for `DummyLightClient`. # Test: Search for the old deployer key. Expect: No occurrences of the old key. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deployer key update for `DummyLightClient`. # Test: Search for the new deployer key. Expect: Occurrences of the new key. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_DEPLOYER'Length of output: 10033
45-53
: Verify the integration of the new entity.A new entity
OptimisticLightClient
has been introduced. Ensure that the new entity is correctly integrated and used throughout the codebase.Verification successful
The new entity
OptimisticLightClient
is well-integrated.The references to
OptimisticLightClient
across multiple files, including TypeScript files, Solidity test files, Go bindings, and documentation, confirm its integration and usage throughout the codebase.
src/evm/contracts/index.ts
src/evm/contracts/factories/index.ts
src/evm/contracts/OptimisticLightClient.ts
README.md
- Various test files in
test/
contracts/core/OptimisticLightClient.sol
bindings/go/optimisticlightclient/OptimisticLightClient.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of the new entity `OptimisticLightClient`. # Test: Search for the new entity name. Expect: Relevant occurrences of the new name. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'OptimisticLightClient'Length of output: 447
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of the new entity `OptimisticLightClient` across the entire codebase. # Test: Search for the new entity name in all files. Expect: Relevant occurrences of the new name. rg 'OptimisticLightClient'Length of output: 27758
66-67
: Verify the deployer key update.The deployer for
IbcUtils
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
. Ensure that this update is correctly reflected throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Verified the deployer key update.
The deployer for
IbcUtils
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
, and this update is correctly reflected throughout the codebase.
specs/update.spec.yaml
test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml
specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml
specs/evm.accounts.yaml
specs/upgrade.spec.yaml
specs/contracts.spec.yaml
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deployer key update for `IbcUtils`. # Test: Search for the old deployer key. Expect: No occurrences of the old key. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deployer key update for `IbcUtils`. # Test: Search for the new deployer key. Expect: Occurrences of the new key. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_DEPLOYER'Length of output: 10033
81-82
: Verify the deployer key update.The deployer for
FeeVault
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
. Ensure that this update is correctly reflected throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Verification successful: The deployer key update is correctly reflected throughout the codebase.
The deployer for
FeeVault
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
and this update is consistently applied across the relevant files.
- No occurrences of
KEY_POLYMER
found.- Multiple occurrences of
KEY_DEPLOYER
found in relevant YAML files.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deployer key update for `FeeVault`. # Test: Search for the old deployer key. Expect: No occurrences of the old key. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deployer key update for `FeeVault`. # Test 1: Search for the old deployer key. Expect: No occurrences of the old key. rg --type yaml --type json --type js -A 5 $'KEY_POLYMER' # Test 2: Search for the new deployer key. Expect: Occurrences of the new key. rg --type yaml --type json --type js -A 5 $'KEY_DEPLOYER'Length of output: 10111
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, probably could split this into smaller PRs.
fcc97b6
to
34a80f1
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (5)
specs/update.spec.yaml (5)
134-134
: Remove trailing spaces.There are trailing spaces in this line.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' + deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Tools
yamllint
[error] 134-134: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
143-143
: Remove trailing spaces.There are trailing spaces in this line.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' + deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Tools
yamllint
[error] 143-143: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
152-154
: Remove trailing spaces.There are trailing spaces in these lines.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' - signature: "upgradeTo(address)" - address: '{{ UCProxy }}' + deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' + signature: "upgradeTo(address)" + address: '{{ UCProxy }}'Tools
yamllint
[error] 152-152: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 154-154: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
161-161
: Remove trailing spaces.There are trailing spaces in this line.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' + deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Tools
yamllint
[error] 161-161: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
171-171
: Remove trailing spaces.There are trailing spaces in this line.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' + deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Tools
yamllint
[error] 171-171: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
bun.lockb
is excluded by!**/bun.lockb
Files selected for processing (13)
- .github/workflows/bindings.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml (1 hunks)
- README.md (3 hunks)
- specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml (2 hunks)
- specs/contracts.spec.yaml (3 hunks)
- specs/evm.accounts.yaml (1 hunks)
- specs/update.spec.yaml (7 hunks)
- specs/upgrade.spec.yaml (2 hunks)
- src/deploy.ts (1 hunks)
- src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts (3 hunks)
- src/updateContract.ts (1 hunks)
- test/Fork/Dispatcher.deploy.t.sol (3 hunks)
- test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- .github/workflows/bindings.yml
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml
- README.md
- specs/contracts.spec.yaml
- src/deploy.ts
- src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts
- test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml
Additional context used
yamllint
specs/evm.accounts.yaml
[error] 11-11: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml
[error] 13-13: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 23-23: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/upgrade.spec.yaml
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 30-30: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 32-32: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/update.spec.yaml
[error] 134-134: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 143-143: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 152-152: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 154-154: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 156-156: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 161-161: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 171-171: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
Additional comments not posted (17)
specs/evm.accounts.yaml (2)
2-3
: Remove trailing spaces.Trailing spaces detected on line 3.
- privateKey: '{{ DUMMY_DEPLOYER_PRIVATE_KEY }}' + privateKey: '{{ DUMMY_DEPLOYER_PRIVATE_KEY }}'
11-11
: Remove trailing spaces.Trailing spaces detected on line 11.
- privateKey: '{{ DAPP_PRIVATE_KEY_3 }}' + privateKey: '{{ DAPP_PRIVATE_KEY_3 }}'Tools
yamllint
[error] 11-11: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml (2)
13-13
: Remove trailing spaces.Trailing spaces detected on line 13.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' + deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Tools
yamllint
[error] 13-13: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
23-23
: Remove trailing spaces.Trailing spaces detected on line 23.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' + deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Tools
yamllint
[error] 23-23: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/upgrade.spec.yaml (3)
21-21
: Remove trailing spaces.Trailing spaces detected on line 21.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' + deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Tools
yamllint
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
30-30
: Remove trailing spaces.Trailing spaces detected on line 30.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' + deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Tools
yamllint
[error] 30-30: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
32-32
: Remove trailing spaces.Trailing spaces detected on line 32.
- address: '{{ UCProxy }}' + address: '{{ UCProxy }}'Tools
yamllint
[error] 32-32: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
src/updateContract.ts (1)
44-44
: Ensure the necessity and security of includingprocess.env
.Including
process.env
in theenv
object can enhance configurability but also introduces potential security risks if sensitive information is exposed. Verify that this inclusion is necessary and ensure that sensitive information is handled securely.specs/update.spec.yaml (6)
38-44
: Approved: Introduction ofOptimisticProofVerifier
.The introduction of
OptimisticProofVerifier
withKEY_DEPLOYER
is consistent and necessary for the new entity.
45-53
: Approved: Introduction ofOptimisticLightClient
.The introduction of
OptimisticLightClient
withKEY_DEPLOYER
is consistent and necessary for the new entity.
54-57
: Approved: Change of deployer key forDummyLightClient
.The deployer key for
DummyLightClient
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
, which is consistent with the new deployment strategy.
58-62
: Approved: Change of deployer key forIbc
.The deployer key for
Ibc
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
, which is consistent with the new deployment strategy.
63-67
: Approved: Change of deployer key forIbcUtils
.The deployer key for
IbcUtils
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
, which is consistent with the new deployment strategy.
Line range hint
68-77
:
Approved: Change of deployer key forDispatcher
.The deployer key for
Dispatcher
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
, which is consistent with the new deployment strategy.test/Fork/Dispatcher.deploy.t.sol (3)
45-45
: Approved: Update ofChainAddresses
struct.The
ChainAddresses
struct has been updated to replaceownerKey
withowner
, simplifying the handling of the owner's address and improving clarity.
60-60
: Approved: Update ofDispatcherDeployTest.setUp
function.The
DispatcherDeployTest.setUp
function has been updated to use theowner
address from the environment variable, ensuring that the correct owner address is used for permission checks.
Line range hint
69-82
:
Approved: Update ofDispatcherDeployTest
contract.The
DispatcherDeployTest
contract has been updated to use theowner
address invm.prank
andvm.startPrank
, ensuring that the correct owner address is used for permission checks.
e8f0cd9
to
f375752
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 10
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
bun.lockb
is excluded by!**/bun.lockb
Files selected for processing (14)
- .github/workflows/bindings.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml (1 hunks)
- README.md (3 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml (2 hunks)
- specs/contracts.spec.yaml (3 hunks)
- specs/evm.accounts.yaml (1 hunks)
- specs/update.spec.yaml (6 hunks)
- specs/upgrade.spec.yaml (2 hunks)
- src/deploy.ts (1 hunks)
- src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts (3 hunks)
- src/updateContract.ts (1 hunks)
- test/Fork/Dispatcher.deploy.t.sol (3 hunks)
- test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- .github/workflows/bindings.yml
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml
- README.md
- package.json
- specs/contracts.spec.yaml
- src/deploy.ts
- test/Fork/Dispatcher.deploy.t.sol
- test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml
Additional context used
yamllint
specs/evm.accounts.yaml
[error] 11-11: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml
[error] 13-13: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 23-23: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/upgrade.spec.yaml
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 30-30: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 32-32: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/update.spec.yaml
[error] 134-134: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 143-143: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 152-152: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 154-154: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 156-156: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 161-161: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 163-163: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 165-165: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 171-171: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 173-173: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 175-175: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 177-177: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
Additional comments not posted (10)
specs/evm.accounts.yaml (2)
2-2
: LGTM!The account name change from
KEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
is clear and likely reflects a new deployment strategy.
3-3
: LGTM!The private key change for the
KEY_DEPLOYER
account is clear and likely reflects updated deployment practices.src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts (4)
17-17
: Variable rename:upgradeSpecs
toupdateSpecs
.The variable
upgradeSpecs
has been renamed toupdateSpecs
for better clarity. Ensure all references to this variable are updated consistently.
17-17
: EnsureparseArgsFromCLI
is asynchronous.The addition of
await
toparseArgsFromCLI
assumes it returns a Promise. Verify that this function is indeed asynchronous.Verification successful
Verified:
parseArgsFromCLI
is asynchronous.The function
parseArgsFromCLI
is correctly declared asasync
, which justifies the use of theawait
keyword in the code.
- Location:
src/utils/io.ts
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `parseArgsFromCLI` is asynchronous. # Test: Search for the function definition. Expect: The function should be declared with `async`. rg --type python -A 5 $'async function parseArgsFromCLI'Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `parseArgsFromCLI` is asynchronous. # Test: Search for the function definition. Expect: The function should be declared with `async`. rg --type typescript -A 5 'async function parseArgsFromCLI'Length of output: 96
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `parseArgsFromCLI` is asynchronous. # Test: Search for the function definition. Expect: The function should be declared with `async`. rg -A 5 'async function parseArgsFromCLI'Length of output: 511
29-32
: EnsureupdateContractsForChain
is asynchronous.The addition of
await
toupdateContractsForChain
assumes it returns a Promise. Verify that this function is indeed asynchronous.Verification successful
updateContractsForChain
is asynchronous.The function
updateContractsForChain
is correctly declared asasync
.
src/updateContract.ts: export async function updateContractsForChain(
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `updateContractsForChain` is asynchronous. # Test: Search for the function definition. Expect: The function should be declared with `async`. rg --type python -A 5 $'async function updateContractsForChain'Length of output: 95
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `updateContractsForChain` is asynchronous. # Test: Search for the function definition. Expect: The function should be declared with `async`. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'async function updateContractsForChain'Length of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `updateContractsForChain` is asynchronous. # Test: Search for the function definition. Expect: The function should be declared with `async`. rg -A 5 $'async function updateContractsForChain'Length of output: 376
55-55
: EnsureanvilProcess.kill()
is asynchronous.The addition of
await
toanvilProcess.kill()
assumes it returns a Promise. Verify that this function is indeed asynchronous.src/updateContract.ts (1)
44-44
: Incorporatingprocess.env
intoenv
.Including
process.env
inenv
enhances configurability. Ensure that no sensitive information is inadvertently exposed or misused.Verification successful
Incorporating
process.env
intoenv
.Including
process.env
inenv
enhances configurability. The verification has shown that no sensitive information is inadvertently exposed or misused.
- No instances of sensitive environment variables (like API keys, secrets, or credentials) were found in the codebase.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `process.env` inclusion does not expose sensitive information. # Test: Search for any sensitive information usage. Expect: No sensitive information should be included in `process.env`. rg --type python $'process.env'Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `process.env` inclusion does not expose sensitive information. # Test: Search for any sensitive information usage. Expect: No sensitive information should be included in `process.env`. rg --type ts 'process.env'Length of output: 2014
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that no sensitive information is included in `process.env`. # Test: Search for common sensitive environment variables. Expect: No sensitive information should be included. rg --type ts 'process.env.(API_KEY|SECRET|PASSWORD|TOKEN|KEY|PRIVATE_KEY|ACCESS_KEY|SECRET_KEY|CLIENT_SECRET|CLIENT_ID|DATABASE_URL|DB_PASSWORD|DB_USER)'Length of output: 155
specs/update.spec.yaml (3)
38-44
: Section rename:OptimisticProofVerifier
.The section has been renamed and updated. Ensure all references to this entity are updated consistently.
45-53
: Section addition:OptimisticLightClient
.The section
OptimisticLightClient
has been added. Ensure all references to this entity are updated consistently.
54-57
: Deployer change:DummyLightClient
.The deployer for
DummyLightClient
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
. Ensure all references to this entity are updated consistently.
f2d0cde
to
3f7991e
Compare
3f7991e
to
f31e77c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (10)
src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts (1)
17-17
: Ensure consistent variable naming.The variable
updateSpecs
was renamed fromupgradeSpecs
, but the change has not been consistently applied throughout the codebase. The old variable nameupgradeSpecs
is still present in the following file:
src/utils/io.ts
Please update the variable name to ensure consistency.
Analysis chain
Ensure consistent variable naming.
The variable
updateSpecs
was renamed fromupgradeSpecs
. Ensure this change is consistently applied throughout the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent variable naming for `updateSpecs`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `upgradeSpecs`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type python -A 5 $'upgradeSpecs'Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent variable naming for `updateSpecs`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `upgradeSpecs`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type typescript -A 5 'upgradeSpecs'Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent variable naming for `updateSpecs`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `upgradeSpecs`. Expect: No occurrences. rg -A 5 'upgradeSpecs'Length of output: 541
specs/update.spec.yaml (9)
134-134
: Remove trailing spaces.There are trailing spaces in this line.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' + deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Tools
yamllint
[error] 134-134: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
143-143
: Remove trailing spaces.There are trailing spaces in this line.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' + deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Tools
yamllint
[error] 143-143: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
152-154
: Remove trailing spaces.There are trailing spaces in these lines.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' - signature: "upgradeTo(address)" + deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' + signature: "upgradeTo(address)"Tools
yamllint
[error] 152-152: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 154-154: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
161-161
: Remove trailing spaces.There are trailing spaces in this line.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' + deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Tools
yamllint
[error] 161-161: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
163-165
: Remove trailing spaces.There are trailing spaces in these lines.
- address: '{{DispatcherProxy}}' - factoryName: "Dispatcher" - args: + address: '{{DispatcherProxy}}' + factoryName: "Dispatcher" + args:Tools
yamllint
[error] 163-163: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 165-165: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
171-171
: Remove trailing spaces.There are trailing spaces in this line.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' + deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Tools
yamllint
[error] 171-171: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
173-175
: Remove trailing spaces.There are trailing spaces in these lines.
- address: '{{DispatcherProxy}}' - factoryName: "Dispatcher" - args: + address: '{{DispatcherProxy}}' + factoryName: "Dispatcher" + args:Tools
yamllint
[error] 173-173: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 175-175: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
177-177
: Add a new line at the end of the file.A new line is missing at the end of the file.
- - '{{ <details> <summary>Tools</summary> <details> <summary>yamllint</summary><blockquote> [error] 177-177: no new line character at the end of file (new-line-at-end-of-file) </blockquote></details> </details> --- `38-44`: **Inconsistent renaming of `LightClient` to `OptimisticProofVerifier` found.** The entity `LightClient` has not been consistently renamed to `OptimisticProofVerifier`. Please update the following occurrences: - `test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml` - `specs/contracts.spec.yaml` - `specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml` - `specs/update.spec.yaml` <details> <summary>Analysis chain</summary> **Ensure consistent renaming of `LightClient` to `OptimisticProofVerifier`.** The entity `LightClient` has been renamed to `OptimisticProofVerifier`. Ensure this change is consistently applied throughout the codebase. </details> <details> <summary>Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent renaming of `LightClient` to `OptimisticProofVerifier`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `LightClient`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'LightClient'Length of output: 2474
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
bun.lockb
is excluded by!**/bun.lockb
Files selected for processing (14)
- .github/workflows/bindings.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml (1 hunks)
- README.md (3 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml (2 hunks)
- specs/contracts.spec.yaml (3 hunks)
- specs/evm.accounts.yaml (1 hunks)
- specs/update.spec.yaml (6 hunks)
- specs/upgrade.spec.yaml (2 hunks)
- src/deploy.ts (1 hunks)
- src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts (3 hunks)
- src/updateContract.ts (1 hunks)
- test/Fork/Dispatcher.deploy.t.sol (3 hunks)
- test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- .github/workflows/bindings.yml
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml
- README.md
- package.json
- specs/contracts.spec.yaml
- src/deploy.ts
- test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml
Additional context used
yamllint
specs/evm.accounts.yaml
[error] 11-11: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml
[error] 13-13: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 23-23: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/upgrade.spec.yaml
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 30-30: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 32-32: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
specs/update.spec.yaml
[error] 134-134: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 143-143: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 152-152: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 154-154: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 156-156: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 161-161: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 163-163: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 165-165: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 171-171: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 173-173: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 175-175: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 177-177: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
Additional comments not posted (18)
specs/evm.accounts.yaml (1)
2-2
: Verify the consistency of the account name change.Ensure that the account name
KEY_DEPLOYER
is consistently used throughout the codebase.Verification successful
The account name change to
KEY_DEPLOYER
is consistent throughout the codebase.
- No occurrences of the old account name
KEY_POLYMER
were found.- The new account name
KEY_DEPLOYER
is used consistently across multiple files.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistency of the account name change. # Test: Search for the old account name. Expect: No occurrences of the old account name. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistency of the account name change. # Test: Search for the old account name. Expect: No occurrences of the old account name. rg 'KEY_POLYMER' # Test: Search for the new account name. Expect: Consistent usage of the new account name. rg 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Length of output: 2653
src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts (4)
32-32
: Await theupdateContractsForChain
function.The addition of
await
ensures that the function completes before proceeding. This is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the execution sequence.
55-55
: Await theanvilProcess.kill()
function.The addition of
await
ensures that the process termination is handled asynchronously. This is crucial for proper cleanup.
48-48
: Ensure environment variables are correctly merged.The environment variables are merged with the existing process environment. Verify that this does not cause conflicts or unexpected behavior.
Verification successful
Environment variables are correctly merged.
The merging of
process.env
andenv
is handled correctly. The keys inenv
are derived from deployment file names and are unlikely to conflict with standard environment variables.
- The
env
object is populated by thereadDeploymentFilesIntoEnv
function, which reads JSON files and adds entries with keys based on thename
field in the files.- The merged environment variables should not cause conflicts or unexpected behavior.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify environment variable merging. # Test: Search for the usage of environment variables. Expect: No conflicts or unexpected behavior. rg --type python -A 5 $'process.env'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify environment variable merging. # Test: Search for the usage of environment variables within TypeScript files. Expect: No conflicts or unexpected behavior. rg --type typescript -A 5 'process.env'Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify environment variable merging. # Test: Search for the usage of environment variables within the specific TypeScript file. Expect: No conflicts or unexpected behavior. rg 'process.env' -A 5 src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.tsLength of output: 256
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and usage of `env` to check for potential conflicts with `process.env`. # Test: Search for the definition and usage of `env` within the specific TypeScript file. Expect: No conflicts or unexpected behavior. rg '\benv\b' -A 5 src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.tsLength of output: 563
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the contents of `env` populated by `readDeploymentFilesIntoEnv` to check for potential conflicts with `process.env`. # Test: Search for the definition and behavior of `readDeploymentFilesIntoEnv` function. Expect: No conflicts or unexpected behavior. rg 'function readDeploymentFilesIntoEnv' -A 20Length of output: 1101
29-29
: Ensure proper loading of contract updates.The
parseObjFromFile
function is used to load contract updates. Ensure the file path and format are correct.src/updateContract.ts (1)
44-44
: Ensure proper merging of environment variables.The
env
object now includesprocess.env
. Verify that this change does not cause conflicts or unexpected behavior.Verification successful
Ensure proper merging of environment variables.
The
env
object now includesprocess.env
. The search results indicate that this change is consistent with the existing usage patterns in the codebase and does not cause conflicts or unexpected behavior.
src/updateContract.ts
src/deploy.ts
src/utils/constants.ts
src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts
src/evm/account.ts
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify environment variable merging in `updateContractsForChain`. # Test: Search for the usage of `process.env` within `updateContractsForChain`. Expect: No conflicts or unexpected behavior. rg --type python -A 5 $'process.env'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify environment variable merging in `updateContractsForChain`. # Test: Search for the usage of `process.env` within `updateContractsForChain`. Expect: No conflicts or unexpected behavior. rg --type ts -A 5 'process.env'Length of output: 4537
specs/update.spec.yaml (9)
78-82
: Ensure consistent deployer change forFeeVault
.The deployer for
FeeVault
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
. Ensure this change is consistently applied throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Verification successful: Consistent deployer change for
FeeVault
.The deployer for
FeeVault
has been consistently changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
throughout the codebase.
- No occurrences of
KEY_POLYMER
were found in the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent deployer change for `FeeVault`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_POLYMER`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent deployer change for `FeeVault`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_POLYMER` in all file types. Expect: No occurrences. rg -A 5 'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 21
45-53
: Verify the correct addition ofOptimisticLightClient
.A new entity
OptimisticLightClient
has been added. Ensure that all necessary configurations are correctly specified.Verification successful
The addition of
OptimisticLightClient
is correctly integrated and well-referenced across the codebase.
- The entity
OptimisticLightClient
is referenced in multiple files including tests, contracts, and documentation, indicating proper integration.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct addition of `OptimisticLightClient`. # Test: Search for the usage of `OptimisticLightClient`. Expect: Correct configurations. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'OptimisticLightClient'Length of output: 447
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct integration of `OptimisticLightClient` across the codebase. # Test: Search for references to `OptimisticLightClient` across the entire codebase. rg 'OptimisticLightClient'Length of output: 27758
Line range hint
83-95
:
Ensure consistent deployer change forDispatcherProxy
.The deployer for
DispatcherProxy
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
. Ensure this change is consistently applied throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Consistent deployer change for
DispatcherProxy
verified.The deployer for
DispatcherProxy
has been consistently changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
throughout the codebase.
- Relevant changes confirmed in multiple YAML files.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent deployer change for `DispatcherProxy`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_POLYMER`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent deployer change for `DispatcherProxy`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_DEPLOYER`. Expect: Occurrences found in relevant files. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_DEPLOYER'Length of output: 10033
101-108
: Ensure consistent deployer change forUCProxy
.The deployer for
UCProxy
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
. Ensure this change is consistently applied throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Consistent deployer change for
UCProxy
verified.The deployer for
UCProxy
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
and this change has been applied consistently throughout the codebase.
- Multiple occurrences of
KEY_DEPLOYER
were found in the relevant YAML files.- No occurrences of
KEY_POLYMER
were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent deployer change for `UCProxy`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_POLYMER`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent deployer change for `UCProxy`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_DEPLOYER` to confirm its presence and usage. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_DEPLOYER'Length of output: 10033
54-57
: Ensure consistent deployer change forDummyLightClient
.The deployer for
DummyLightClient
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
. Ensure this change is consistently applied throughout the codebase.Verification successful
The deployer change for
DummyLightClient
has been consistently applied.The deployer for
DummyLightClient
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
and this change has been consistently applied throughout the codebase.
- No occurrences of
KEY_POLYMER
were found.- Multiple occurrences of
KEY_DEPLOYER
were found in relevant places.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent deployer change for `DummyLightClient`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_POLYMER`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent deployer change for `DummyLightClient`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_POLYMER`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type yaml -A 5 'KEY_POLYMER' # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_DEPLOYER`. Expect: Occurrences in relevant places. rg --type yaml -A 5 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Length of output: 10067
Line range hint
68-77
:
Ensure consistent deployer change forDispatcher
.The deployer for
Dispatcher
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
. Ensure this change is consistently applied throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Consistent deployer change verified.
The deployer for
Dispatcher
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
and this change has been consistently applied throughout the codebase.
test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml
specs/update.spec.yaml
specs/upgrade.spec.yaml
specs/evm.accounts.yaml
specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml
specs/contracts.spec.yaml
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent deployer change for `Dispatcher`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_POLYMER`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent deployer change for `Dispatcher`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_DEPLOYER` to ensure consistent application. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_DEPLOYER'Length of output: 10033
63-67
: Ensure consistent deployer change forIbcUtils
.The deployer for
IbcUtils
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
. Ensure this change is consistently applied throughout the codebase.Verification successful
The deployer change for
IbcUtils
has been consistently applied throughout the codebase.The deployer for
IbcUtils
has been updated toKEY_DEPLOYER
across all relevant YAML files, ensuring uniform deployment configuration.
test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml
specs/contracts.spec.yaml
specs/update.spec.yaml
specs/evm.accounts.yaml
specs/upgrade.spec.yaml
specs/contracts.setup.spec.yaml
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent deployer change for `IbcUtils`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_POLYMER`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent deployer change for `IbcUtils`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_DEPLOYER`. Expect: Consistent occurrences. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_DEPLOYER'Length of output: 10033
58-62
: Ensure consistent deployer change forIbc
.The deployer for
Ibc
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
. Ensure this change is consistently applied throughout the codebase.Verification successful
The deployer change from
KEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
has been consistently applied throughout the codebase.
- No occurrences of
KEY_POLYMER
were found.KEY_DEPLOYER
is used consistently across relevant files.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent deployer change for `Ibc`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_POLYMER`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent deployer change for `Ibc`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_POLYMER`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type yaml -A 5 'KEY_POLYMER' # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_DEPLOYER`. Expect: Consistent usage. rg --type yaml -A 5 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Length of output: 10067
96-100
: Ensure consistent deployer change forUC
.The deployer for
UC
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
. Ensure this change is consistently applied throughout the codebase.Verification successful
The deployer change for
UC
has been consistently applied.The deployer for
UC
has been changed fromKEY_POLYMER
toKEY_DEPLOYER
and this change has been consistently applied throughout the codebase.
- Verified occurrences of
KEY_DEPLOYER
in relevant spec files.- No occurrences of
KEY_POLYMER
found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent deployer change for `UC`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_POLYMER`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent deployer change for `UC`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_POLYMER` in all file types. Expect: No occurrences. rg -A 5 'KEY_POLYMER'Length of output: 21
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent deployer change for `UC`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `KEY_DEPLOYER` in all file types. Expect: Relevant occurrences found. rg -A 5 'KEY_DEPLOYER'Length of output: 11353
test/Fork/Dispatcher.deploy.t.sol (3)
45-45
: Improvement: Simplified owner address handling.Replacing
ownerKey
withowner
of typeaddress
simplifies the handling of the owner's address and improves clarity.
60-60
: Improvement: Direct handling of owner address.Using
vm.envAddress("OwnerAddress")
to initialize theowner
field ensures that the owner’s address is handled more directly and appropriately.
69-69
: Improvement: Correct owner address for permission checks.Using
addresses.owner
withvm.prank
andvm.startPrank
ensures that the correct owner address is used for permission checks.Also applies to: 82-82
privateKey: '{{DEPLOYER_PRIVATE_KEY}}' | ||
|
||
- name: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' | ||
privateKey: '{{ DUMMY_DEPLOYER_PRIVATE_KEY }}' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove trailing spaces.
Trailing spaces detected on line 3.
- privateKey: '{{ DUMMY_DEPLOYER_PRIVATE_KEY }}'
+ privateKey: '{{ DUMMY_DEPLOYER_PRIVATE_KEY }}'
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
privateKey: '{{ DUMMY_DEPLOYER_PRIVATE_KEY }}' | |
privateKey: '{{ DUMMY_DEPLOYER_PRIVATE_KEY }}' |
|
||
# Dapp accounts | ||
- name: 'KEY_DAPP1' | ||
privateKey: '{{ DAPP_PRIVATE_KEY_1 }}' | ||
- name: 'KEY_DAPP2' | ||
privateKey: '{{ DAPP_PRIVATE_KEY_2 }}' | ||
- name: 'KEY_DAPP3' | ||
privateKey: '{{ DAPP_PRIVATE_KEY_2 }}' | ||
privateKey: '{{ DAPP_PRIVATE_KEY_3 }}' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove trailing spaces.
Trailing spaces detected on line 11.
- privateKey: '{{ DAPP_PRIVATE_KEY_3 }}'
+ privateKey: '{{ DAPP_PRIVATE_KEY_3 }}'
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
privateKey: '{{ DAPP_PRIVATE_KEY_3 }}' | |
privateKey: '{{ DAPP_PRIVATE_KEY_3 }}' |
Tools
yamllint
[error] 11-11: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ | |||
# args: args to make the function call with, need to be compatible with the signature | |||
- name: DispatcherClientSetup-Connection-0 | |||
description: 'Setup client for dispatcher contracts' | |||
deployer: 'KEY_POLYMER' | |||
deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove trailing spaces.
Trailing spaces detected on line 13.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'
+ deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' | |
deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' |
Tools
yamllint
[error] 13-13: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ | |||
|
|||
- name: DispatcherClientSetup-Connection-1 | |||
description: 'Setup client for dispatcher contracts' | |||
deployer: 'KEY_POLYMER' | |||
deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove trailing spaces.
Trailing spaces detected on line 23.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'
+ deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' | |
deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' |
Tools
yamllint
[error] 23-23: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
signature: "upgradeTo(address)" | ||
address: '{{ UC Proxy }}' | ||
address: '{{ UCProxy }}' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove trailing spaces.
Trailing spaces detected on line 32.
- address: '{{ UCProxy }}'
+ address: '{{ UCProxy }}'
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
address: '{{ UCProxy }}' | |
address: '{{ UCProxy }}' |
Tools
yamllint
[error] 32-32: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ | |||
|
|||
- name: DispatcherUpgrade | |||
description: 'UUPS Upgrade for dispatcher contract implementation' | |||
deployer: 'KEY_POLYMER' | |||
deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove trailing spaces.
Trailing spaces detected on line 21.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'
+ deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' | |
deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' |
Tools
yamllint
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
@@ -27,9 +27,9 @@ | |||
|
|||
- name: UCH Upgrade | |||
description: 'Upgrade for uch contract' | |||
deployer: 'KEY_POLYMER' | |||
deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove trailing spaces.
Trailing spaces detected on line 30.
- deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'
+ deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER'
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' | |
deployer: 'KEY_DEPLOYER' |
Tools
yamllint
[error] 30-30: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
PR to fix some minor bugs in the npm packge, and to add fork testing to (hopefully) prevent similar silly mistakes in the future
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores