-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update params implementation #901
Update params implementation #901
Conversation
79b90ba
to
67570d5
Compare
c67f102
to
a3050d4
Compare
a3050d4
to
05a44a0
Compare
Disjoint pool changes look good (but you should probably change umfDisjointPoolParamsSetName to use deep copy as marked in the comment.) |
05a44a0
to
ab46aaf
Compare
ab46aaf
to
477c341
Compare
Done |
477c341
to
056e493
Compare
056e493
to
9d74c17
Compare
@pbalcer @igchor I just tested this version of UMF with the 2025.0 compiler. Seems it works. Looks like this change does not break ABI. Of course, I run just a single test app, but it works. I understand that UR needs to be updated to use the new API, but I hope having ABI compatibility decreases the probability that we will break compiler CI with this transition. |
Description
Ref. #844
Checklist