-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
adcirc coupled with ww3 is not working #1
Comments
This means ADCIRC does not send currents to WW3. So maybe there is a field dictionary issue in here. It seems ADCIRC could get the radiation stress comonents from WW3, we still need to check the import and export states. If you don’t mind could you set
Anyway, let me know when you run the case with the changes. Then I could look at it again. |
@uturuncoglu WW3 gets the atm. fields. Take a look at florence_atm2adc2ww3_250m/run/out_grd.ww3.nc file for the variables UAX and UAY. It doesnt't matter if we use ww3_shel.inp or ww3_shel.nml according to WW3 developers they are processed the same way without any issues. Anyway I will try your suggestion. Let me check if I can get an output for radiation stresses from ADCIRC. |
@pvelissariou1 I am not sure how coupling fields are defined in inp format. I could see T in the file but maybe those needs to be C. Anyway, lets follow the convention that is already used by the SCHSIM RT. |
@uturuncoglu
In fd_ufs.yaml I have
and in my ww3_shel.nml I have:
... and the simulation crashes. Switched back to ww3_shel.inp and the simulation proceeds. Most likely the *.nml file is incomplete, I'll report back |
@pvelissariou1 please use this configuration and not switch. Just share your run directory that belongs to this run. I'll like to see the point it crashes? Crashes are always our friend :) |
@uturuncoglu Here is the ww3_shel.nml.log, dates/times after the field dates are all wrong. may be this is the issue.
I will continue the current run. Will submit again the one that crashes. |
@pvelissariou1 Could be. Please double check the configuration. Once it crash I could look. Maybe I could copy your run directory and look at more carefully. |
@uturuncoglu I am working on it, I'll report back my findings. |
@uturuncoglu
The simulation crashes due to WW3 crash. I don't understand exactly what So_u and So_v variables do as we define "surface_eastward_sea_water_velocity" and "surface_northward_sea_water_velocity" and this is what WW3 accepts. |
@uturuncoglu In my ww3_shel.inp file I use:
but I get in the *.ESMF_LogFile files the following "not connected" messages:
|
@pvelissariou1 If you could copy the run directory to Orion, I could try to run and fix in my side. We are adding those aliases to the field dictionary since the field names are not matching and it is not connected by the mediator. Anyway, I could try to debug once I have the run directory. Is this DATM+ADCIRC+WW3? If you could send me your compile command along with the run directory that would be great. |
@uturuncoglu I am building all PAHM, ADCIRC, WW3 to account for all different configurations. The command I am using to compile on hera in the test directory is: |
@uturuncoglu The run folder is at: |
@pvelissariou1 Did you make any change in the ADCIRC build? Mine is not building since ADCIRC and WW3 has same module name for constants. So, I am getting error like following,
I could fix it but let me know if you have any changes in your end. BTW, I could also sync ADCIRC along with this but not sure we need to sync it or not. |
@uturuncoglu If I remember correctly I hda created a PR to ADCIRC and they have merged the changes. |
I created a PR (pending review/approval by Zach) for the NUOPC (thirdparty/nuopc) part only. I will submit another PR for the "adcprep" part. After that, and upon successful RT results, latest ADCIRC is to be merged in UFS-Coastal. |
PR #2 pending review |
@jan, this is the PR. From the ADCIRC side upstream, Zach waits Dam's response on some PR details before merging. When the PR is merged in the ADCIRC repo we can sync the fork or we can point instead UFS-Coastal to ADCIRC repo. |
@pvelissariou1 Can you also link the PR for the NUOPC part, as I did for your oceanmodeling/adcirc PR? On the page for this issue there is a section called "Development" where you can add that PR from the adcirc/adcirc repo ... I can't do it since I don't have permissions on the adcirc/adcirc repo. if you link your PRs to this issue, then when the PRs are approved and merged, this issue will automatically close. If issues remain after that, you can create a new issue in this repo that is more specific |
@janahaddad This is one PR altogether, I just did it in two stages |
Initial mail from @pvelissariou1:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: