Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove injections about RO:has_skeleton. #3416

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gouttegd
Copy link
Collaborator

In RO, 'has skeleton' (RO:0002551) is domain-restricted to 'anatomical structure' (UBERON:0000061) and range-restricted to 'material anatomical entity' (UBERON:0000465).

Currently, in Uberon we are overriding those restrictions by injecting tigher constraints: a domain restriction to 'organism subdivision' (UBERON:0000475) and a range restriction to 'subdivision of skeleton' (UBERON:0010912).

A ticket to upstream those tighter restrictions to RO has gone nowhere in more than one year
(oborel/obo-relations#700).

This PR removes the Uberon-injected restrictions and leaves it to RO to decide whether they should adopt them or not.

Of note, the only inferred axiom that those tighter restrictions give us is this one:

'nose' SubClassOf: 'organism subdivision'

So we don't lose much by removing them until they are (maybe) added back directly by RO.

Related to #2453

In RO, 'has skeleton' (RO:0002551) is domain-restricted to 'anatomical
structure' (UBERON:0000061) and range-restricted to 'material anatomical
entity' (UBERON:0000465).

Currently, in Uberon we are overriding those restrictions by injecting
tigher constraints: a domain restriction to 'organism subdivision'
(UBERON:0000475) and a range restriction to 'subdivision of skeleton'
(UBERON:0010912).

A ticket to upstream those tighter restrictions to RO has gone nowhere
in more than one year
(oborel/obo-relations#700).

This PR removes the Uberon-injected restrictions and leaves it to RO to
decide whether they should adopt them or not.

Of note, the only inferred axiom that those tighter restrictions give us
is this one:

> 'nose' SubClassOf: 'organism subdivision'

So we don't lose much by removing them until they are (maybe) added back
directly by RO.

Related to #2453
@gouttegd gouttegd requested a review from anitacaron as a code owner November 11, 2024 17:26
@gouttegd gouttegd self-assigned this Nov 11, 2024
@gouttegd gouttegd requested review from cmungall and dosumis November 11, 2024 17:49
@anitacaron anitacaron removed their request for review November 13, 2024 17:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant