-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix some ZFA mapping errors #3361
Conversation
ZFA's 'griseum centrale' (ZFA:0000518) is mapped to Uberon's 'central gray substance of midbrain' (UBERON:0003040). This is likely incorrect as the ZFA term refers to a structure that is part of the hindbrain, whereas the Uberon term refers to a midbrain structure. The correct mapping is most likely 'central gray substance of medulla' (UBERON:0002867), which is part of the hindbrain. partially addresses #3353
ZFA's 'coelom' (ZFA:0001438) is mapped to Uberon's 'coelemic cavity lumen' (UBERON:0002323). This is incorrect as the ZFA terms refers to a multi-tissue structure and therefore to a material entity, whereas the Uberon term refers to the anatomical cavity *within* the coelom (an immaterial entity). Uberon has another term to refer to the (material) anatomical structure that forms the coelemic cavity: 'coelom' (UBERON:0011997), the ZFA term should be mapped to that term instead. partially addresses #3353
ZFA's 'inferior raphe nucleus' (ZFA:0000366) is mapped to Uberon's 'dorsal raphe nucleus' (UBERON:0002043). This is likely wrong for at least two reasons: * the ZFA term refers to a nucleus that is part of the hindbrain, whereas the Uberon term refers to a nucleus that is part of the midbrain; * according to Beecher, Beamer & Bartlett 2019 [1], the 'dorsal raphe nucleus' is one of the *superior* raphe nuclei, which makes it doubtful, even considering possible terminological differences across species, that it should be mapped to an *inferior* raphe nucleus. The same reference states that the 'inferior raphe nucleus' is a complex comprising the following nuclei: * the 'nucleus raphe obscurus' (UBERON:0002684), * the 'nucleus raphe pallidus' (UBERON:0002157), * and the 'nucleus raphe magnus' (UBERON:0002156). In Uberon, those three nuclei are the parts that make up the 'medullary raphe nuclear complex' (UBERON:0002692), leading me to believe that this complex is in fact what ZFA (along with Beecher, Beamer, & Bartlett) calls the 'inferior raphe nucleus'. So here, we remap ZFA's 'inferior raphe nucleus' to 'medullary raphe nuclear complex', and also add a 'inferior raphe nuclei' synonym to the Uberon term. closes #3356 [1] doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-800050-2.00006-1
This PR has not seen any activity in the past month; if nobody comments or reviews it in the next week, the PR creator will be allowed to proceed with merging without explicit approval, should they wish to do so. |
We had re-mapped ZFA:0000366 ('inferior raphe nucleus') from UBERON:0002043 ('dorsal raphe nucleus') to UBERON:0002692 ('medullary raphe nuclear complex'), which seemed a better match. However, for lack of certainty about what the ZFA term really represents, it is better to drop the mapping entirely.
PR updated to remove entirely the mapping with ZFA’s 'inferior raphe nucleus', as suggested in the comments of #3356. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with the changes in 'coelom' and the 'inferior raphe nucleus', but I think there might be a mistake in the ZFA definition for 'Griseum centrale'.
There are conflicting statements in the available literature regarding the mammalian equivalent of ZFA's 'griseum centrale'. Candidates include: * the 'central gray substance of midbrain' (aka the 'periaqueductal gray'), according to Olson et al. 2024 (doi:10.1016/j.ibror.2017.01.001); * the 'nucleus incertus', according to Spikol et al. 2024 (doi:10.7554/eLife.89516.3); * and the 'central gray substance of medulla', based on the classification of the ZFA term. It is better to simply remove the mapping for now.
This PR fixes a handful of “simple” mapping errors¹ between ZFA and Uberon:
See the linked issues (or the individual commit messages) for the rationale behind each remapping.
closes #3353
closes #3356
¹ What I mean by “simple mapping error”: the error is simply that a ZFA term is mapped to the wrong Uberon term, but none of the term on either side is otherwise incorrect.