Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix some ZFA mapping errors #3361

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

gouttegd
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR fixes a handful of “simple” mapping errors¹ between ZFA and Uberon:

See the linked issues (or the individual commit messages) for the rationale behind each remapping.

closes #3353
closes #3356


¹ What I mean by “simple mapping error”: the error is simply that a ZFA term is mapped to the wrong Uberon term, but none of the term on either side is otherwise incorrect.

ZFA's 'griseum centrale' (ZFA:0000518) is mapped to Uberon's 'central
gray substance of midbrain' (UBERON:0003040).

This is likely incorrect as the ZFA term refers to a structure that is
part of the hindbrain, whereas the Uberon term refers to a midbrain
structure.

The correct mapping is most likely 'central gray substance of medulla'
(UBERON:0002867), which is part of the hindbrain.

partially addresses #3353
ZFA's 'coelom' (ZFA:0001438) is mapped to Uberon's 'coelemic cavity
lumen' (UBERON:0002323).

This is incorrect as the ZFA terms refers to a multi-tissue structure
and therefore to a material entity, whereas the Uberon term refers to
the anatomical cavity *within* the coelom (an immaterial entity).

Uberon has another term to refer to the (material) anatomical structure
that forms the coelemic cavity: 'coelom' (UBERON:0011997), the ZFA term
should be mapped to that term instead.

partially addresses #3353
ZFA's 'inferior raphe nucleus' (ZFA:0000366) is mapped to Uberon's
'dorsal raphe nucleus' (UBERON:0002043).

This is likely wrong for at least two reasons:

* the ZFA term refers to a nucleus that is part of the hindbrain,
  whereas the Uberon term refers to a nucleus that is part of the
  midbrain;
* according to Beecher, Beamer & Bartlett 2019 [1], the 'dorsal raphe
  nucleus' is one of the *superior* raphe nuclei, which makes it
  doubtful, even considering possible terminological differences across
  species, that it should be mapped to an *inferior* raphe nucleus.

The same reference states that the 'inferior raphe nucleus' is a complex
comprising the following nuclei:

* the 'nucleus raphe obscurus' (UBERON:0002684),
* the 'nucleus raphe pallidus' (UBERON:0002157),
* and the 'nucleus raphe magnus' (UBERON:0002156).

In Uberon, those three nuclei are the parts that make up the 'medullary
raphe nuclear complex' (UBERON:0002692), leading me to believe that this
complex is in fact what ZFA (along with Beecher, Beamer, & Bartlett)
calls the 'inferior raphe nucleus'.

So here, we remap ZFA's 'inferior raphe nucleus' to 'medullary raphe
nuclear complex', and also add a 'inferior raphe nuclei' synonym to the
Uberon term.

closes #3356

[1] doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-800050-2.00006-1
@gouttegd gouttegd self-assigned this Sep 12, 2024
Copy link

This PR has not seen any activity in the past month; if nobody comments or reviews it in the next week, the PR creator will be allowed to proceed with merging without explicit approval, should they wish to do so.

We had re-mapped ZFA:0000366 ('inferior raphe nucleus') from
UBERON:0002043 ('dorsal raphe nucleus') to UBERON:0002692 ('medullary
raphe nuclear complex'), which seemed a better match.

However, for lack of certainty about what the ZFA term really
represents, it is better to drop the mapping entirely.
@gouttegd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

PR updated to remove entirely the mapping with ZFA’s 'inferior raphe nucleus', as suggested in the comments of #3356.

Copy link
Collaborator

@aleixpuigb aleixpuigb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with the changes in 'coelom' and the 'inferior raphe nucleus', but I think there might be a mistake in the ZFA definition for 'Griseum centrale'.

src/ontology/uberon-edit.obo Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
There are conflicting statements in the available literature regarding
the mammalian equivalent of ZFA's 'griseum centrale'.

Candidates include:

* the 'central gray substance of midbrain' (aka the 'periaqueductal
  gray'), according to Olson et al. 2024
  (doi:10.1016/j.ibror.2017.01.001);
* the 'nucleus incertus', according to Spikol et al. 2024
  (doi:10.7554/eLife.89516.3);
* and the 'central gray substance of medulla', based on the
  classification of the ZFA term.

It is better to simply remove the mapping for now.
@gouttegd gouttegd requested a review from aleixpuigb October 22, 2024 17:50
@gouttegd gouttegd merged commit 6b3b2eb into master Oct 23, 2024
1 check passed
@gouttegd gouttegd deleted the 3353-3356-fix-zfa-mapping-errors branch October 23, 2024 09:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ZFA/Uberon issues: inferior raphe nucleus ZFA/Uberon mapping errors
2 participants