Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Roadmap: First draft o3de.org website information architecture for usability testing #101

Open
2 tasks
chanmosq opened this issue Feb 7, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
kind/roadmap Categorizes an issue that goes in the O3DE Public Roadmap

Comments

@chanmosq
Copy link
Contributor

chanmosq commented Feb 7, 2023

Summary

To draft a proposal for restructuring the information architecture of o3de.org/docs.

The information architecture was first designed with thoughtful consideration in 2021. Since then, we've many contributions and feedback that urges us to reconsider it's design. Some key design tenets we want to consider in the redesign is ease of discoverability and scalability of the product.

What is the relevance of this feature?

  • What problems does it solves?
  • Why is this important?
  • What will it do once completed?
  • Are there any changes or impacts to other features?

Tasks

Preview Give feedback
  1. RTE WF8 kind/content-architecture kind/website priority/critical sig/docs-community sig/ui-ux triage/needs-information

Related Links

Link to additional informaton such as RFC related to the roadmap item.


Learn more about O3DE roadmaps.

@chanmosq chanmosq added the kind/roadmap Categorizes an issue that goes in the O3DE Public Roadmap label Feb 7, 2023
@chanmosq chanmosq moved this from Backlog to To do in O3DE - Docs and Community Roadmap Mar 16, 2023
@chanmosq chanmosq self-assigned this Mar 16, 2023
@chanmosq
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/roadmap Categorizes an issue that goes in the O3DE Public Roadmap
Projects
Status: In progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant