Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestions for Improving the Content and Engagement of the "About" Section and the whole website #11

Open
hellosamyak opened this issue Jan 12, 2025 · 6 comments

Comments

@hellosamyak
Copy link

I reviewed the "About" section & the overall website and observed that while it contains comprehensive information about the DISC Program and Unconference, there are areas where readability, structure, and engagement could be improved. Here's a detailed analysis:

Observations and Suggested Enhancements

1. Readability
The text is dense, with long paragraphs and limited use of subheadings or bullet points. This makes it harder to scan for key information.
Suggestions:

  • Break the content into smaller paragraphs.
  • Use bullet points or numbered lists where appropriate (e.g., for the Unconference Goals).

2. Clarity
Some sentences and ideas are complex, requiring re-reading for understanding.
Suggestions:

  • Simplify language where possible to improve accessibility for a global audience.
  • Include a concise summary of the DISC Program’s mission at the beginning for better context.

3. Structure
The current flow could be reorganized to improve coherence. For instance, details about the DISC Program and the Unconference are interspersed, which might confuse readers.
Suggestions:

  • Group content into clearly labeled sections, such as:
  • "DISC Program Overview"
  • "DISC Unconference Mission"
  • "Unconference Goals"
  • "Event Details"
  • "Future Collaboration"
  • Use subheadings to make the page easier to navigate.

4. Event Details
The details about the 2025 Unconference are clear but buried within the text.
Suggestions:
Present key event details (e.g., date, location, number of participants) in a table or a concise bullet-point list for quick reference.

5. Visual Elements
The section is text-heavy and lacks visual engagement.
Suggestions:
Include relevant images, such as pictures from past events or graphics illustrating diversity in open-source communities.

@hellosamyak
Copy link
Author

Hi! @melissawm
I reviewed the website and noticed areas where content structure, readability, and engagement could be enhanced. To address this, I’ve created this issue detailing observations and specific suggestions for improvement.

I’d love to contribute to this section by refining the language, reorganizing the structure, and suggesting ways to make it more visually engaging and impactful. Please let me know if I can proceed with this contribution.

Thank you for your time and consideration!

@melissawm
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @hellosamyak,

Copy on these pages should probably be approved by NumFOCUS. Since the conference organization is well underway, I'm not sure there is much value in changing the contents of this repo unless there are problems.

@kamila-NF what do you think?

@nareshsinghankit1
Copy link

The website should now be available at http://localhost:3000/disc-unconference-2025/
@melissawm ,Hi please you tell me the web we create but the you give ,i also paste did not work on my pc , what to do.

@nareshsinghankit1
Copy link

Screenshot (6)
this is show on my browse

@Mohit-Lakra
Copy link

Mohit-Lakra commented Jan 12, 2025

@hellosamyak
Can we use html file instead of md file to provide it a better styling

Also I made some changes which you described,
Now the about page looks like this
If you want then I can raise a PR
Screenshot 2025-01-13 at 1 54 43 AM

Screenshot 2025-01-13 at 1 54 53 AM Screenshot 2025-01-13 at 1 55 11 AM Screenshot 2025-01-13 at 1 55 25 AM Screenshot 2025-01-13 at 1 55 38 AM

@Mohit-Lakra
Copy link

But I was thinking of that kind of stuff for this we require html

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants