You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I encountered an issue while trying to define the cell type-specific markers, as defined in the Nature paper (Loyfer, N., Magenheim, J., Peretz, A. et al. A DNA methylation atlas of normal human cell types. Nature 613, 355–364 (2023).), using find markers.
I'm attempting to replicate the methods form the Nature paper.
To do this, I downloaded all the beta and pat files from GSE186458.
I tried to define the top 1000 cell type-specific markers to replicate markers listed in supplementary table 4c.
However, I noticed there was very little overlap between the marker I defined and those in supple table 4c.
So, I checked all the dataset i used.
but there was nothing wrong
Could you please help me identify what might be causing this discrepancy?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I encountered an issue while trying to define the cell type-specific markers, as defined in the Nature paper (Loyfer, N., Magenheim, J., Peretz, A. et al. A DNA methylation atlas of normal human cell types. Nature 613, 355–364 (2023).), using find markers.
I'm attempting to replicate the methods form the Nature paper.
To do this, I downloaded all the beta and pat files from GSE186458.
I tried to define the top 1000 cell type-specific markers to replicate markers listed in supplementary table 4c.
Herer are the commands I used:
wgbstools segment --beta_file total_beta_file --min_cpg 5 --max_bp 5000 -@ 85 -o NMA.blocks.bed
wgbstools find_markers --blocks_path NMA.blocks.bed --groups_file total_beta_file.group.csv --beta_list_file total_beta_file --min_cpg 5 --min_bp 10 --max_bp 1500 -@ 85 --only_hypo -c 25 --top 1000 -o NMA.dmr.U.top1000
However, I noticed there was very little overlap between the marker I defined and those in supple table 4c.
So, I checked all the dataset i used.
but there was nothing wrong
Could you please help me identify what might be causing this discrepancy?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: