Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Licensing mispatch between hdf5 and these plugins #14

Open
picca opened this issue Apr 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Licensing mispatch between hdf5 and these plugins #14

picca opened this issue Apr 18, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@picca
Copy link

picca commented Apr 18, 2020

Hello, it seems that the license of hdf5 is now bsd-3-clauses [1]

Is it possible to re-license all the plugins withe same license.

this way it will be a lot consistent between hdf5 and the plugins.

for example, hdf5 is compatible with the GPL license, but plugins are not [2], advertising clause.

thanks for considering.

[1] https://www.hdfgroup.org/package/hdf5/?wpdmdl=12838&refresh=5e9abfde35b691587199966
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses#4-clause_license_(original_%22BSD_License%22)

@eugenwintersberger
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Frederic,
i made a little survey and it turns out that the situation is a bit more complex than I expected. Lets start with the filter code

  • the bitshuffle code has its origins here
  • the BLOSC code is from Francesc Alted and has its origins from the PyTables project
  • BZIP2 is from PyTables too
  • the LZ4 code, I suspect, was added by Herbert. But I am not sure if this is his code or if he took it from somewhere else.

For most of the infrastructure files I think we can easily change the license, however, for the third party stuff we have to contact the original authors.

@yayahjb
Copy link
Collaborator

yayahjb commented May 11, 2020 via email

@eugenwintersberger
Copy link
Contributor

Can I close this issue?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants