Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Which prompt was used in the paper's result? #43

Open
Hyfred opened this issue Feb 25, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Which prompt was used in the paper's result? #43

Hyfred opened this issue Feb 25, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@Hyfred
Copy link

Hyfred commented Feb 25, 2024

Thanks for your nice work, I have a short question:

I noticed both prompt mechanisms(prefix_prompt and suffix_prompt) were used in all three tasks. So my question is which one is the result shown in the paper?

@yyy-Apple
Copy link
Collaborator

The results shown in our paper is the avg of all prompts (see section 4.2.2 Settings -- Selection of Prompts for more details). Specifically, we get the score for one hypothesis by taking the average of all its generation scores using different prompts.

@Hyfred
Copy link
Author

Hyfred commented Mar 1, 2024

There are two methods for adding a prompt during score calculation: either appending it to the source text or prepending it to the target text, as described in Section 3.3.1.

Based on the description in Section 4.2.2 and Appendix A.4, is the experimental result derived from conducting the experiment by prefixing the decoder (prepending the prompt to the target text)?

Because I noticed there is another option (prefixing in the source text) as well, it is confusing to me.

@yyy-Apple
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm not exactly sure, since it's been a long time. You can check the numbers with analysis.ipynb to see which one matches the results. As I recall, we may have used the avg of prepending to the target text.

@Hyfred
Copy link
Author

Hyfred commented Mar 1, 2024

Got it, thanks for your reply!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants