-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
'... shall be [fined, imprisoned, or both]' #142
Comments
Is "both" elliptical for "both fined and imprisoned", and if so, is it a VP with "both" functioning as fused Marker-Head? Or should we just say that it's an NP (fused determiner-head) and anaphora can lead to coordination of unlike categories? |
Yes, I think both is a fused Marker-Head. 3.2.4 Marker-Head |
@BrettRey is this what you mean? It gives a Coordination headed by a DP which is anomalous, but I can't think of a better solution. |
yes. Does that make sense? |
There was some discussion about whether "both" is a fused Det-Head NP, roughly short for "both of these" or "both things", which would be similar to analyzing "etc." as a fused Marker-Head NP parallel to "and others". Intuitively, though, it feels like "both" is used here like the Marker in correlative coordination. Notably, "all" cannot appear in correlative coordination, and also is strange in this construction:
"All of the above" is the ordinary way to express this, and is a clear NP. The other correlative coordinations are either...or and neither...nor. "Neither" also works in the right context:
It's hard for me to think of a case where "either" makes sense semantically since "or" is already typically disjunctive. |
(A different construction with "neither":
I don't think this bears on our analysis of the above.) |
TL;DR of our analysis:
|
Should we treat this as ternary-branching coordination? If so, the first two coordinates are presumably VP... how about "both"?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: