Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Relative elevation #6

Open
leendertvanwolfswinkel opened this issue Mar 28, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Relative elevation #6

leendertvanwolfswinkel opened this issue Mar 28, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@leendertvanwolfswinkel
Copy link
Collaborator

Currently, all design heights are absolute (e.g. in m.a.s.l.), rather than relative to the base raster. In many cases, it would be much quicker if you could excavate or heighten an area with a certain value.
@leendertvanwolfswinkel leendertvanwolfswinkel added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 28, 2019
@leendertvanwolfswinkel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This would also allow definition type 'stats' , resulting in a constant elevation based on an aggregate of the base raster, e.g. min, max, p25.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@leendertvanwolfswinkel