Dual-license as (CC0-1.0 OR MIT-0) #63
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #56.
MIT-0 license text based on https://opensource.org/license/mit-0.
@richardfontana This corresponds to a Fedora package with
CC0-1.0code using the exception for pre-existing code. I brought it up in the original “CC0 update status” issue – before that exception was formalized, I think – and you commented on it. I had asked the author to consider relicensing or dual-licensing Hedley, and they just replied in #56 (comment). Since this PR is at Fedora’s request, would you mind taking a quick look to see if it looks “clean” from your perspective? Thanks!