You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Based on fluent analysis i see only one advantage: unimrcp requires installing and configuring, when asterisk-audiofork requires only the C-script to be dumbped called from dialplan. Is there more advantages. And what are the disadvantages?
By the way, see, https://github.com/unispeech/swig-wrapper. It seems like it has python and other languages-based WebSocker listner servers. Would be nice to see it it added to the README.MD if it matches the asterisk-audiofork requests.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
i have limited knowledge of unimrcp but based on what i do know it is its own spec and requires integration of a server and client in a way it is similar to app_jack. I personally have not worked with unimrcp there could be many advantages to using that based on the use case but i don't know.
as for the comment on the swig-wrapper it can be added to the README although i have not considered how or why it would be. if you have any suggestions please let me know.
also let me know if you have any other queries / need more info.
Based on fluent analysis i see only one advantage: unimrcp requires installing and configuring, when asterisk-audiofork requires only the C-script to be dumbped called from dialplan. Is there more advantages. And what are the disadvantages?
By the way, see, https://github.com/unispeech/swig-wrapper. It seems like it has python and other languages-based WebSocker listner servers. Would be nice to see it it added to the README.MD if it matches the asterisk-audiofork requests.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: