You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
`Fsync the file after writing to gaurantee persistence
Call this in a new process to perform in bgk
"""
def _serialize_and_persist(
self,
filepath,
snapshot,
active_snapshot,
lock,
linkpath=None,
iter_chk = None,
epoch_chk = None,
overwrite = True):
print("[{}] START ASYNC".format(time.time()))
with lock:
if active_snapshot.value == 0:
self.logger.error("Cannot persist. Empty snapshot")
return
#Create new stream
s = torch.cuda.Stream()
torch.cuda.stream(s)
#print("Saving : {}".format(filepath))
torch.save(snapshot, filepath)
#print("Saved : {}".format(filepath))
# Clear the snapshot.
with lock:
active_snapshot.value = 0
# Ensure its persisted
f = open(filepath, 'a+')
os.fsync(f.fileno())
f.close()
update_stats(
filepath,
iter_chk=iter_chk,
overwrite=overwrite,
epoch_chk = epoch_chk,
linkpath=linkpath)
print("[{}] END ASYNC".format(time.time()))`
In this code segment: # Create new stream s = torch.cuda.Stream() torch.cuda.stream(s) torch.save(snapshot, filepath)
I tested it and found that it did not achieve the overlapping of computation and saving. It seems that CheckFreq did not call the entire function. Could you please advise if this function is feasible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
`Fsync the file after writing to gaurantee persistence
Call this in a new process to perform in bgk
"""
def _serialize_and_persist(
self,
filepath,
snapshot,
active_snapshot,
lock,
linkpath=None,
iter_chk = None,
epoch_chk = None,
overwrite = True):
print("[{}] START ASYNC".format(time.time()))
In this code segment:
# Create new stream s = torch.cuda.Stream() torch.cuda.stream(s) torch.save(snapshot, filepath)
I tested it and found that it did not achieve the overlapping of computation and saving. It seems that CheckFreq did not call the entire function. Could you please advise if this function is feasible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: