We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It might be worth to add a note to the README that on some platforms (*BSD) using fe80::/10 instead of /64 might be problematic.
From Wireguard mailinglist
FreeBSD and probably other *BSD/macOS use those unused 56 bits to store the link scope_id. And support nonstandard fe80:1::30/64 notation instead of fe80::30%1/64 to specify the scope. https://stackoverflow.com/a/5891805/2303328 https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/blob/76f9308e3e2b80e95630efcdd994f3c133806bf4/share/doc/IPv6/IMPLEMENTATION#L427 https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/blob/e9a39e0c3c22543812afd4de74d1d0ad6782100b/sys/netinet6/scope6.c#L363
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
It might be worth to add a note to the README that on some platforms (*BSD) using fe80::/10 instead of /64 might be problematic.
From Wireguard mailinglist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: