Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

slicing and tick statements #38

Open
Philipp15b opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

slicing and tick statements #38

Philipp15b opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Philipp15b
Copy link
Collaborator

Right now, we do not handle slice tick statements by default. However, I think we might want to slice tick statements by default as well, just only after all assertions have been determined as guaranteed to be irrelevant for an error. In addition, we need to check that we don't introduce regressions (looking at the coupon collector) that could break by another statement being sliced.

@Philipp15b Philipp15b added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant