-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Effectively use batchtools for Targets-based workflow in SLURM #292
Comments
Not the maintainer, but I think you'll increase the chances for fixing/improving things if you can come up with an example that illustrates the problem with only on batchtools code. Also, showing the exact slurm template used can increase the chances to reproduce this, and maybe even reproduce it on other schedulers. The more details, the better |
For future visitors ropensci/targets#570 (comment) may help. It looks like the CRAN version of After a recent chat with @stemangiola & as per @HenrikBengtsson suggestion & I'm working on a working |
A reproducible example based on targets is a first step, but I'd think you'll significantly increase the chances for a faster response/fix if you make it use vanilla batchtools code. If not, you're basically asking whoever is going to look into this to do that work, i.e. to peel of the targets and the future.batchtools code to find what needs to be fixed in batchtools. |
I only mention it because I strongly suspect the work has already been done (as mentioned in the previous link) & implemented in the GitHub version of Before people submit new issues to |
Thanks for the great package.
We are converting a makeflow workflow to R using
targets
+batchtools
, for a SLURM system.However, we find practically unusable because the job that fail do not communicate to
batchtools
that thinks are still executing. They might fail for memory overflow or timeout.Please see ropensci/targets#932
Are you aware of these limitations and do you know a way to solve this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: