You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are many projects out there that use Lua 5.1 or 5.2, mainly because they are based on LuaJIT rather than PUC-Lua. In order to run such Lua scripts on the JVM, currently the best way to do this involves using LuaJ. In order to LuaJ users a viable alternative, it would be good to have a compatibility layer for running Lua 5.1 and 5.2 on Rembulan.
The simplest way to go about this would be adding alternative implementations of the standard library. This would not provide the exact semantics as Lua 5.1 or 5.2, but might be sufficient in most cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are many projects out there that use Lua 5.1 or 5.2, mainly because they are based on LuaJIT rather than PUC-Lua. In order to run such Lua scripts on the JVM, currently the best way to do this involves using LuaJ. In order to LuaJ users a viable alternative, it would be good to have a compatibility layer for running Lua 5.1 and 5.2 on Rembulan.
The simplest way to go about this would be adding alternative implementations of the standard library. This would not provide the exact semantics as Lua 5.1 or 5.2, but might be sufficient in most cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: