You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 23, 2024. It is now read-only.
Currently facet dimensions are uniform and are based on the facet with the most number of tracks. However, in cases where one facet has a disproportionate number of tracks (due to many concurrent events), most of the other facets are empty white space. Each facet could be sized proportionally to the number of tracks; this would affect facet height for linear representations, and both facet height and width for radial and spiral representations.
A side effect of resolving this issue would involve non-uniform row and column dimensions for radial and spiral faceted timelines. A potential workaround would be to make the facets themselves drag-able and align-able using guides relative to the center or top/bottom/right/left of each facet, a la PowerPoint.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently facet dimensions are uniform and are based on the facet with the most number of tracks. However, in cases where one facet has a disproportionate number of tracks (due to many concurrent events), most of the other facets are empty white space. Each facet could be sized proportionally to the number of tracks; this would affect facet height for linear representations, and both facet height and width for radial and spiral representations.
A side effect of resolving this issue would involve non-uniform row and column dimensions for radial and spiral faceted timelines. A potential workaround would be to make the facets themselves drag-able and align-able using guides relative to the center or top/bottom/right/left of each facet, a la PowerPoint.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: