Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Center Loss Placement Concern #222

Open
SuperbTUM opened this issue Aug 11, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Center Loss Placement Concern #222

SuperbTUM opened this issue Aug 11, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@SuperbTUM
Copy link

Hello Hao. I read your journal paper and paid special attention to center loss placement. I saw you decided to put the loss after bn neck to achieve better results, even though this will harm clustering performance. Can you explain a bit more about why this is counter-intuitive as bad clustering for center loss will lead to better re-id accuracy? Is it worth trying stronger inference methods like diminish camera bias, or horizontal flip, to check if the conclusion can be reversed?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant