You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello Hao. I read your journal paper and paid special attention to center loss placement. I saw you decided to put the loss after bn neck to achieve better results, even though this will harm clustering performance. Can you explain a bit more about why this is counter-intuitive as bad clustering for center loss will lead to better re-id accuracy? Is it worth trying stronger inference methods like diminish camera bias, or horizontal flip, to check if the conclusion can be reversed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello Hao. I read your journal paper and paid special attention to center loss placement. I saw you decided to put the loss after bn neck to achieve better results, even though this will harm clustering performance. Can you explain a bit more about why this is counter-intuitive as bad clustering for center loss will lead to better re-id accuracy? Is it worth trying stronger inference methods like diminish camera bias, or horizontal flip, to check if the conclusion can be reversed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: