Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing cross-reference anchors in 002-v5 #293

Open
ronaldtse opened this issue Jan 8, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

Missing cross-reference anchors in 002-v5 #293

ronaldtse opened this issue Jan 8, 2025 · 4 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

asciidoctor: WARNING: <stdin>: line 7721: id assigned to block already in use: tab-C-11
asciidoctor: WARNING: <stdin>: line 7823: id assigned to block already in use: tab-C-12
asciidoctor: WARNING: <stdin>: line 8001: id assigned to block already in use: tab-C-14
asciidoctor: WARNING: <stdin>: line 8878: id assigned to block already in use: tab-D-6
...
Crossreferences: (ID tab-C-11): citygml_20 does not have a corresponding anchor ID in the bibliography!
Crossreferences: (ID tab-C-11): iso_6707-1 does not have a corresponding anchor ID in the bibliography!
Crossreferences: (ID tab-C-12): ifc_2x3_cv does not have a corresponding anchor ID in the bibliography!
...
No label has been processed for ID fig-2-5
No label has been processed for ID fig-4-6
No label has been processed for ID fig-4-7
No label has been processed for ID fig-C-39
No label has been processed for ID fig-R-1
No label has been processed for ID fig-R-2
@ronaldtse ronaldtse added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 8, 2025
@ReesePlews
Copy link
Contributor

ReesePlews commented Jan 8, 2025

thank you @ronaldtse the client was making some modifications to the reference entries in the normative refs and bib, perhaps these errors are showing because of that.

the document.err.html file is not longer being produced and it is difficult to identify errors occurring during compile. when you compile locally is the document.err.html file generated? my local compile and also the github compile no longer create the document.err.html file. do you know why that may be happening?
can the generation of that file be reinstated? it was helpful in the past. thank you

document.xml
document.html
document.pdf
document.pdf.err
document.presentation.xml
document.rxl

@ReesePlews
Copy link
Contributor

@ronaldtse i forgot that the issue with document.err.html not being created was discussed here: https://github.com/ReesePlews/ribose_discussions/issues/34

@ReesePlews
Copy link
Contributor

hello @AIS-RyoMukai @AAS-YknKawakita
in trying to understand what these messages mean above, these errors

Crossreferences: (ID tab-C-11): citygml_20 does not have a corresponding anchor ID in the bibliography!
Crossreferences: (ID tab-C-11): iso_6707-1 does not have a corresponding anchor ID in the bibliography!
Crossreferences: (ID tab-C-12): ifc_2x3_cv does not have a corresponding anchor ID in the bibliography!

they are in 002-v5 and these three references citygml_20 (OGC 12-019), iso_6707-1 (ISO 6707-1) and ifc_2x3_cv

in 002-v5 citygml_20 is
* [[[ogc_12-019,OGC 12-019]]],
in the normative references; sources\002-v5\sections\00-overview\section-02-normrefs.adoc

i cannot find the other two references in 002-v5. so they will need to be added either in 002-v5 bib or 002-v5 normative refs

please check at your convenience. thank you.

@ReesePlews
Copy link
Contributor

hi @ronaldtse in tracking down a couple of these issues i noticed this:

image

in the image, the mouse-over popup in the lower source reference appears to retain the "label" from an earlier reference, but not the preceding reference.

the source file is:
sources\001-v5\sections\section-04\section-22.adoc

image

just wanted to mention this. if you think it should be written up as an issue, let me know where. thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants