We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Given the following example:
>>> bic = BIC('BSABESBB') >>> bic <BIC=BSABESBB> >>> bic.country_code 'ES' >>> bic.domestic_bank_codes ['0008', '0013', '0042', '0043', '0046', '0081', '0106', '0112', '0118', '0119', '0185', '0209', '0217', '0230', '0236', '2005', '2076', '2090', '2093', '2102'] >>> bic = BIC('BSABESBBXXX') >>> bic.domestic_bank_codes [] >>> bic = BIC('BSABESBB001') >>> bic.domestic_bank_codes []
I will expect that the domestic_bank_codes returns also the same bank codes when using extended format. Is this the expected behaviour?
domestic_bank_codes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Given the following example:
I will expect that the
domestic_bank_codes
returns also the same bank codes when using extended format.Is this the expected behaviour?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: