Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Thanks @bsmth. I think this is a good start and a good disclaimer to rule out the things that are out of scope at the moment 👍. At the minimum, we do need to run the spell checker locally (from the CLI or IDE). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi all, I believe the topic of spellchecking has come up many times - this is difficult because of how many files we have, the number of coding languages we are working with and custom text we use, such as macros. If you run
cspell
over the project without any configuration, the output is completely unmanageable.I've been using a local cspell config over the last few months, finding appropriate dictionaries (
lorem-ipsum
etc.) occasionally and I think we can slowly start working with it unobtrusively at the authoring stage.Proposal for now:
Out of scope:
X
weeksI've opened a PR now that can get the ball rolling on this https://github.com/mdn/content/pull/28487/files. It contains:
We may need to occasionally accept/ignore changes to these two files in content PRs going forward, but I hope that's acceptable.
Using cspell
From the terminal, it looks like:
Looking at IDE support in VSCode, for example, spellchecking and adding unknown words to a project dictionary is quite good via quick-fix (command + .)
Or in the problems panel:
Let me know what you think!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions