Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make GIS data products more accessible #198

Open
jbpaduan opened this issue Mar 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Make GIS data products more accessible #198

jbpaduan opened this issue Mar 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@jbpaduan
Copy link
Collaborator

jbpaduan commented Mar 11, 2024

Builds on issue #75
From the main map, define a box, include what type of mission (e.g., AUV only) and what format you need a file in (e.g., geoTiff, UTM), and employing the prioritization of the selected missions (e.g., production only, not testing or failed), create the file requested.

Alternatively, include a modification date in the compilations list as a proxy for how recent and therefore complete, well-navigated, or clean the map is.

@jbpaduan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

For the record, the alternative approach in the comment above has been completed.
For example, on the page
https://smdb.shore.mbari.org/compilations/mappingauvops2016-northernexpedition-figures_clague_gorda-mauv_northgorda_topo_1m_utm/
I see an image and can mouse-over to see the file name that is of a geoTiff, appropriately, and it uses the stem of the name, ignoring, appropriately, the "slope3225-2350" that follows, and clicking on the image downloads it (awesome!).
Need to note, however, there are a lot of broken thumbnails elsewhere, unfortunately, because I haven't strictly made geoTiff file names match the grid names through time, my bad, in retrospect.
I'd still love to have a way people can make their own data products, as in the initial part of the above comment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants