L2StandardERC20 not being initialized correctly #3
Comments
|
Hello @0xnakato, thank you for reporting the issue! |
|
Hey @vladbochok, can i work on this issue? |
StanislavBreadless
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 14, 2023
Update scripts for new upgrade
|
Hey @vladbochok, can i work on this issue? |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
koloz193
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 11, 2024
use DataEncoding for consistency and fix comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello, I'm testing the ERC20 permit feature with USDC and DAI on the zkSync Era testnet. However, a permit signature created with the token name will not work and returns the error
Invalid signature.And it looks like the bridge token contract is not correctly initialized the ERC20PermitUpgradeable and only
ERC20Upgradeableis initialized.https://github.com/matter-labs/era-contracts/blob/main/zksync/contracts/bridge/L2StandardERC20.sol#L82
The
DOMAIN_SEPARATOR()of the testnet DAI token will return0x630ae2e0feb87df0136547b778ed1ad7bb1fdc555ac24d3a61b55432a339fe12which is the exact value of the uninitialized domain separator.Example codes to generate the same/uninitialized domain separator
https://gist.github.com/0xnakato/2c803385ac4c47c0455d6d0de105538f
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: