You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Inspired by X's (formerly Twitter) Community Notes (formerly Birdwatch) feature, I believe Mastodon could benefit from a similar system that allows users to collaboratively add context to potentially misleading posts.
This feature would empower the Mastodon community to actively participate in maintaining the quality and accuracy of information shared on the platform.
Key aspects of this feature could include:
User-generated notes: Allow users to propose additional context or fact-checks for specific posts.
Collaborative evaluation: Implement a system where other users can rate the helpfulness and accuracy of these notes.
Diverse perspective requirement: Ensure that notes are evaluated by users with varying viewpoints to reduce bias.
Visibility thresholds: Display notes publicly only when they reach a certain level of positive evaluation from a diverse group of users.
Application to all content: Allow notes to be added to posts from any user, including high-profile accounts and potentially even federated posts.
Integration with Mastodon's federated structure: Consider how this feature could work across different instances while respecting individual instance policies.
Potential names for this feature:
Mastodon Memos
Fedi Facts
Toot Truths
Community Context
Collaborative Clarifications
Federated Footnotes
Instance Insights
Toot Annotations
Mastodon Margins
Collective Commentary
Implementing such a feature could significantly enhance Mastodon's ability to self-regulate and provide users with additional context for the content they encounter. It aligns well with Mastodon's principles of decentralization and community-driven governance.
I personally believe that this feature would be a valuable addition to Mastodon, promoting information integrity while empowering users to actively participate in maintaining the quality of discourse on the platform.
Inspired by X's (formerly Twitter) Community Notes (formerly Birdwatch) feature, I believe Mastodon could benefit from a similar system that allows users to collaboratively add context to potentially misleading posts.
This feature would empower the Mastodon community to actively participate in maintaining the quality and accuracy of information shared on the platform.
Key aspects of this feature could include:
User-generated notes: Allow users to propose additional context or fact-checks for specific posts.
Collaborative evaluation: Implement a system where other users can rate the helpfulness and accuracy of these notes.
Diverse perspective requirement: Ensure that notes are evaluated by users with varying viewpoints to reduce bias.
Visibility thresholds: Display notes publicly only when they reach a certain level of positive evaluation from a diverse group of users.
Application to all content: Allow notes to be added to posts from any user, including high-profile accounts and potentially even federated posts.
Integration with Mastodon's federated structure: Consider how this feature could work across different instances while respecting individual instance policies.
Potential names for this feature:
Implementing such a feature could significantly enhance Mastodon's ability to self-regulate and provide users with additional context for the content they encounter. It aligns well with Mastodon's principles of decentralization and community-driven governance.
I personally believe that this feature would be a valuable addition to Mastodon, promoting information integrity while empowering users to actively participate in maintaining the quality of discourse on the platform.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Twitter/s/Q1oPZopiyT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Notes
https://help.x.com/en/using-x/community-notes
https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/about/introduction
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: