Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Community-Driven Fact-Checking System #924

Open
T3kn3vr4 opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Community-Driven Fact-Checking System #924

T3kn3vr4 opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@T3kn3vr4
Copy link

T3kn3vr4 commented Nov 14, 2024

Inspired by X's (formerly Twitter) Community Notes (formerly Birdwatch) feature, I believe Mastodon could benefit from a similar system that allows users to collaboratively add context to potentially misleading posts.

This feature would empower the Mastodon community to actively participate in maintaining the quality and accuracy of information shared on the platform.

Key aspects of this feature could include:

  1. User-generated notes: Allow users to propose additional context or fact-checks for specific posts.

  2. Collaborative evaluation: Implement a system where other users can rate the helpfulness and accuracy of these notes.

  3. Diverse perspective requirement: Ensure that notes are evaluated by users with varying viewpoints to reduce bias.

  4. Visibility thresholds: Display notes publicly only when they reach a certain level of positive evaluation from a diverse group of users.

  5. Application to all content: Allow notes to be added to posts from any user, including high-profile accounts and potentially even federated posts.

  6. Integration with Mastodon's federated structure: Consider how this feature could work across different instances while respecting individual instance policies.

Potential names for this feature:

  1. Mastodon Memos
  2. Fedi Facts
  3. Toot Truths
  4. Community Context
  5. Collaborative Clarifications
  6. Federated Footnotes
  7. Instance Insights
  8. Toot Annotations
  9. Mastodon Margins
  10. Collective Commentary

Implementing such a feature could significantly enhance Mastodon's ability to self-regulate and provide users with additional context for the content they encounter. It aligns well with Mastodon's principles of decentralization and community-driven governance.

I personally believe that this feature would be a valuable addition to Mastodon, promoting information integrity while empowering users to actively participate in maintaining the quality of discourse on the platform.


https://www.reddit.com/r/Twitter/s/Q1oPZopiyT

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Notes

https://help.x.com/en/using-x/community-notes

https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/about/introduction

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant