You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We currently export our karst features as Shapefile with all String fields, which makes it difficult to filter/sort GIS data on numeric fields, for example. I propose changing datatypes as annotated:
OGRFeature(karst_feature_locations):10
internal_i (String) = 9173 -> Integer
locid (String) = 9114 -> Integer
survey_id (String) = GBR0310
name (String) = Cow Pasture Cave
alternate_ (String) = (null)
type (String) = Cave
coord_acqu (String) = (null)
wgs84_lon (String) = -80.123456789012345 -> Real
wgs84_lat (String) = 37.123456789012345 -> Real
nad83_utmz (String) = 17N
nad83_utme (String) = 512345.4830204895 -> Real
nad83_utmn (String) = 4123456.6519877245 -> Real
elevation (String) = 1517 -> Real
region (String) = Muddy Creek Basin
county (String) = Greenbrier
quad (String) = Asbury
length (String) = 150 -> Real
depth (String) = 0 -> Real
length_bas (String) = estimate
significan (String) = False
access enu (String) = (null)
access des (String) = (null)
todo enum (String) = (null)
todo descr (String) = (null)
source (String) = (null)
gislbl_pri (String) = 8 -> Integer
POINT (-80.1234567890123 37.1234567890123)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We currently export our karst features as Shapefile with all
String
fields, which makes it difficult to filter/sort GIS data on numeric fields, for example. I propose changing datatypes as annotated:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: