You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
Working with nanopore reads i´m using mash screen to identify the genomes from an input reads file as follow:
mash screen -w -p 3 refseq.genomes.k21s1000.msh reads_nanopore.fq.gz
So far it is doing pretty well as i recover a specific genome (propionibacteria) i was expecting in the metagenome (just using a small subset of 4000 nanopore reads).
I was not expecting the plant genomes in there so i was wondering if there is some finetuning to do ?
For instance filtering on the number of shared-hashes ??
Is this the proper usage to get the mapped genomes of my nanopore reads ?
David
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@davidvilanova i don't think that is a plant genome, it looks like a plant pathogen; a microbe of some sort. it might have phage content similar to your bacterium
Hi,
Working with nanopore reads i´m using mash screen to identify the genomes from an input reads file as follow:
mash screen -w -p 3 refseq.genomes.k21s1000.msh reads_nanopore.fq.gz
So far it is doing pretty well as i recover a specific genome (propionibacteria) i was expecting in the metagenome (just using a small subset of 4000 nanopore reads).
I was not expecting the plant genomes in there so i was wondering if there is some finetuning to do ?
For instance filtering on the number of shared-hashes ??
Is this the proper usage to get the mapped genomes of my nanopore reads ?
David
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: