Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

reconsider att&ck classification for get/set-uefi-variable.yml #944

Open
mike-hunhoff opened this issue Oct 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

reconsider att&ck classification for get/set-uefi-variable.yml #944

mike-hunhoff opened this issue Oct 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
att&ck false positive False positive rule hit

Comments

@mike-hunhoff
Copy link
Collaborator

We should reconsider the att&ck classification for

capa-rules/host-interaction/bootloader/get-uefi-variable.yml

Line 11 in 64b174e

- Persistence::Pre-OS Boot::System Firmware [T1542.001]
and

capa-rules/host-interaction/bootloader/set-uefi-variable.yml

Line 11 in 64b174e

- Persistence::Pre-OS Boot::System Firmware [T1542.001]
.

Without additional indicators, I'm not sure that we can draw the conclusion that getting/setting UEFI variables results in boot persistence.
@mike-hunhoff mike-hunhoff added false positive False positive rule hit att&ck labels Oct 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
att&ck false positive False positive rule hit
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mike-hunhoff