-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 297
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Communication
: Fix visibility of create channel option for students
#9989
Communication
: Fix visibility of create channel option for students
#9989
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce a new utility function, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/course-conversations.component.ts (1)
428-428
: Consider adding null check for better safety.The use of non-null assertion operator (
!
) could lead to runtime errors ifthis.course
is undefined.Consider this safer implementation:
-canCreateChannel: canCreateChannel(this.course!), +canCreateChannel: this.course ? canCreateChannel(this.course) : false,
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/course-conversations.component.ts
(2 hunks)src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar.component.html
(1 hunks)src/main/webapp/app/types/sidebar.ts
(1 hunks)src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/sidebar/sidebar.component.spec.ts
(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
src/main/webapp/app/types/sidebar.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar.component.html (1)
Pattern src/main/webapp/**/*.html
: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.
src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/course-conversations.component.ts (1)
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/sidebar/sidebar.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts
: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/main/webapp/app/types/sidebar.ts (1)
44-44
: LGTM! Clean and focused type definition.
The new optional boolean property canCreateChannel
is well-placed and follows the TypeScript naming conventions.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar.component.html (1)
38-43
: LGTM! Clean implementation of conditional rendering.
The implementation correctly uses the new Angular @if directive and follows a logical structure within the dropdown menu. The addition of the 'createChannel' class aids in testing.
src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/course-conversations.component.ts (3)
43-43
: LGTM! Import statement follows Angular guidelines.
The import of the canCreateChannel
utility function is well-placed and follows naming conventions.
428-428
: LGTM! Implementation aligns with PR objectives.
The addition of canCreateChannel
property effectively controls the visibility of the create channel button based on user permissions.
428-428
: Verify the complete implementation chain.
Let's verify the integration between the permission check and the sidebar template.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the implementation chain.
Implementation chain is properly integrated
The verification shows a complete and correct implementation chain:
- The
canCreateChannel
utility is properly defined inconversation-permissions.utils.ts
with correct course permission check - It's correctly used in
course-conversations.component.ts
to pass the permission - The sidebar template properly controls button visibility based on this permission
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of canCreateChannel utility
echo "Checking canCreateChannel utility implementation:"
ast-grep --pattern 'export function canCreateChannel($_) {
$$$
}'
# Check sidebar template for button visibility control
echo "Checking sidebar template implementation:"
rg -A 2 'canCreateChannel' 'src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar'
Length of output: 802
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the type definition and usage in sidebar component
echo "Checking sidebar component implementation:"
ast-grep --pattern 'export class SidebarComponent {
$$$
}'
# Find where canCreateChannel is defined
echo "Finding canCreateChannel definition:"
rg -A 5 'export function canCreateChannel'
# Check course-conversations component implementation
echo "Checking course-conversations component:"
rg -A 5 'canCreateChannel: canCreateChannel' 'src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations'
Length of output: 1968
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/sidebar/sidebar.component.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested in TS5. Works as expected. Created channel not visible yo user.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested on TS5, works as expected. Thanks for the quick fix!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested on TS5, works as expected!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested on TS5, works as described
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Checklist
General
Client
Motivation and Context
Students currently see the "Create Channel" button despite lacking the permission to create channel, leading to confusion and errors. (Closes #9969)
Description
The visibility of the "Create Channel" button was fixed using the
canCreateChannel
variable to ensure it only appears for users with the necessary permissions.Steps for Testing
Prerequisites:
Testserver States
Note
These badges show the state of the test servers.
Green = Currently available, Red = Currently locked
Click on the badges to get to the test servers.
Review Progress
Code Review
Manual Tests
Test Coverage
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
SidebarData
interface to include a new optional property for channel creation permissions.