Test Issue

[lrstewart]

Problem:

Here is a link: https://github.com/lrstewart/s2n/blob/master/api/s2n.h

A short description of what the problem is and why we need to fix it. Add reproduction steps if necessary.

Solution:

A description of the possible solution in terms of S2N architecture. Highlight and explain any potentially controversial design decisions taken.

• Does this change what S2N sends over the wire? If yes, explain.
• Does this change any public APIs? If yes, explain.
• Which versions of TLS will this impact?

Requirements / Acceptance Criteria:

What must a solution address in order to solve the problem? How do we know the solution is complete?

• RFC links: Links to relevant RFC(s)
• Related Issues: Link any relevant issues
• Will the Usage Guide or other documentation need to be updated?
• Testing: How will this change be tested? Call out new integration tests, functional tests, or particularly interesting/important unit tests.
  CMakeLists.txt LICENSE Makefile NOTICE README.md api bam-bam-boogieman bin cmake codebuild codecov.yml coverage coverage.info crypto docker-images docs error issues_page lib libcrypto-build libcrypto-root pq-crypto rename_default_branch.sh rename_github_links.sh run.sh s2n.mk scram stuffer test-deps test.sh tests tls tmp tmp2 trun.sh utils Will this change trigger SAW changes? Changes to the state machine, the s2n_handshake_io code that controls state transitions, the DRBG, or the corking/uncorking logic could trigger SAW failures.
  CMakeLists.txt LICENSE Makefile NOTICE README.md api bam-bam-boogieman bin cmake codebuild codecov.yml coverage coverage.info crypto docker-images docs error issues_page lib libcrypto-build libcrypto-root pq-crypto rename_default_branch.sh rename_github_links.sh run.sh s2n.mk scram stuffer test-deps test.sh tests tls tmp tmp2 trun.sh utils Should this change be fuzz tested? Will it handle untrusted input? Create a separate issue to track the fuzzing work.

Out of scope:

Is there anything the solution will intentionally NOT address?

[lrstewart]

This comment has no link