You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
URLExtract pulls in the list of TLDs in the root zone, but there are a number of reserved, test or otherwise special use TLDs that are still valid in URLs in at least some contexts.
I'm looking at rfc6761, rfc6762 and rfc7686, for which I think there should be an extract_private property, but a more generic solution like allowing callers to define their own supplementary(or replacement) set of custom TLDs would be sufficient as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
URLExtract pulls in the list of TLDs in the root zone, but there are a number of reserved, test or otherwise special use TLDs that are still valid in URLs in at least some contexts.
I'm looking at rfc6761, rfc6762 and rfc7686, for which I think there should be an extract_private property, but a more generic solution like allowing callers to define their own supplementary(or replacement) set of custom TLDs would be sufficient as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: