Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
307 lines (247 loc) · 13.8 KB

blip-0039.md

File metadata and controls

307 lines (247 loc) · 13.8 KB
Raw
bLIP: 39 
Title: BOLT 11 Invoice Blinded Path Tagged Field
Author: Elle Mouton <[email protected]>
Status: Draft
Created: 2024-07-08
* Post-History: 2024-06-26: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/blip-bolt-11-invoice-blinded-path-tagged-field/991
License: CC0

Abstract

This bLIP defines a new tagged field for the payment invoice encoding described by BOLT 11 which can be used to communicate encoded blinded path information to the payer of the invoice.

Copyright

This bLIP is licensed under the CC0 license.

Rational

Blinded paths have been included in the BOLT 4 specification and using them in the context of receiving payments is natively supported in the BOLT 12 Offers proposal. However, the Offers proposal also includes various other dependencies such as onion messaging and various new protocol message all of which will require a network wide upgrade before full advantage can be taken of the new protocol. Blinded paths themselves are a useful tool for privacy and potentially more reliable payment delivery due to receiver being able to select paths it knows to be more reliable. This document proposes a carve-out to the existing BOLT 11 invoice format so that testing of blinded paths can be done in implementations that have not yet implemented the full Offers specification. This will be done by adding a new tagged-field type to the BOLT 11 invoice specification that will encode a blinded payment path. With this bLIP, the sender and the receiver of a payment will need to be aware of the new tagged-field and the receiver will need to support route blinding and ideally have direct channel peers who also support route blinding in order to start widening their anonymity set.

Specification

Feature Bit

A new feature bit, bolt11_blinded_path, for the I context will be added using bits from the experimental range. This is required because the BOLT 11 tagged-fields pre-date the TLV format and so nodes parsing the invoice will just skip fields they don't know as there is no concept of "It's OK to be odd". This feature bit thus allows nodes to fail fast if they do not yet understand the new tagged field.

Tagged Field

The proposal is to add the following new tagged field to the set defined in BOLT 11:

  • b (20): data_length variable. One or more entries each containing a blinded payment path for a private route; there may be more than one b field. The field uses the blinded_payinfo type described below which draws heavily on the proposed encoding of the blinded_payinfo subtype defined in the Offers proposal.
  1. subtype: blinded_payinfo
  2. data:
  • [u32:fee_base_msat]
  • [u32:fee_proportional_millionths]
  • [u16:cltv_expiry_delta]
  • [u64:htlc_minimum_msat]
  • [u64:htlc_maximum_msat]
  • [u16:flen]
  • [flen*byte:features]
  • [33*byte:first_ephemeral_blinding_point]
  • [byte:num_hops]
  • [num_hops*blinded_hop:blinded_hops]
  1. subtype: blinded_hop
  2. data:
    • [33*byte:blinded_node_pubkey]
    • [bigsize: cipher_text_length]
    • [cipher_text_length*byte:cipher_text]

The blinded_node_pubkey of the first blinded_hop in a blinded_payinfo is the real public key of the blinded path's introduction node. This encoding was chosen so that num_hops accurately reflects the true number of hops including the introduction node while keeping the number of bytes required for the encoding to a minimum. The cipher_text is the encrypted_recipient_data as defined in BOLT 4 TLV payload.

The fee_base_msat, fee_proportional_millionths and cltv_expiry_delta are the accumulated blinded route policy values as defined in BOLT 4. features is the set of features for the path, first_ephemeral_blinding_point is the blinding point that must be communicated to the introduction node via the blinding field of the payload type.

** Note: see discussion section for question around communicating max_cltv_expiry **

Requirements

An invoice containing the b field type:

  • MUST not contain the r field type.
  • MUST not contain the s field type since a payment address in the context of blinded payments does not make sense since the recipient is able to use the path_id in the encrypted_recipient_data for the same purpose.
  • SHOULD sign the invoice with a private key that is not the same as their public node ID and should not set the destination node (n field).
  • Each blinded_path must fit within the data_length size limit. This places an upper limit of approximately 7 blinded_hops on each path. See the appendix for the estimation calculation.
  • If the invoice will be displayed in QR form, then this also places an upper limit on the number of blinded_path fields that can be added to the invoice.
  • The existing c field (min_final_cltv_expiry_delta) is meaningless for an invoice containing the b field since this value is expected to be accounted for in each path's accumulated cltv_expiry_delta.
  • The existing invoice expiry field along with the timestamp field
    should be used to communicate the max_cltv_expiry of the blinded paths in the invoice. The reader should use the 10-minutes-per-block assumption to calculate an estimation of the max_cltv_exipiry value.

Universality

This proposal is a temporary measure that will allow users to start making use of blinded paths in the context of payments and thereby take advantage of the potential privacy and payment success rate benefits that they will in theory provide. Once the Offers protocol along with its new invoice format has been widely deployed, then there will be no use for this BOLT 11 carve-out. Due to the forcasted temporary use of the new field, it makes sense to be in bLIP form rather than adding this in a more temporary way to the spec via a BOLT update proposal. The intent is that this will be used mostly for testing of blinded paths in implementations that have not yet implemented the full Offers spec.

Backwards Compatibility

BOLT 11 states that the reader of an invoice "MUST skip over unknown fields". This means that an un-updated reader of an invoice that includes the new tagged field would skip it when parsing the invoice. The proposal also adds a new feature bit to the invoice feature bit vector and so this gives nodes an indication that the invoice includes something they do not yet understand. Even if un-upgraded senders did not check the feature bit vector, they would not be able to use the invoice as, without knowledge of the blinded path field, it does not contain enough information to attempt a payment since no routing hints will be included and the invoice will be signed with a random ephemeral key meaning that the derived destination node would not correspond to a real node in the graph.

Reference Implementations

The proposed encoding of the new BOLT 11 tagged-field is added to the LND implementation in this PR.

Appendix

Test Vector

The following string is an example of a BOLT11 invoice containing 2 blinded paths, one with 1 hop and one with 3 hops.

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

Breakdown:

This invoice was signed with priv_key=e126f68f7eafcc8b74f54d269fe206be715000f94dac067d1c04a8ca3b2db734. It does not contain a payment secret.

  • lnbc: prefix, Lightning on Bitcoin mainnet
  • 20m: amount (20 milli-bitcoin)
  • 1: Bech32 separator
  • pvjluez: timestamp (1496314658)
  • p: payment hash (0001020304050607080900010203040506070809000102030405060708090102)
  • d: description: '1 cup coffee'
  • b: blinded path:
    • fee_base_msat: 40
    • fee_proportional_millionths: 20
    • cltv_expiry_delta: 130
    • htlc_minimum_msat: 2
    • htlc_maximum_msat: 100
    • flen: 0
    • first_ephemeral_blinding_point: 03f3311e948feb5115242c4e396c81c448ab7ee5fd24c4e24e66c73533cc4f98b8
    • num_hops: 3
    • blinded_hops:
      • blinded_node_pubkey: 03a8c97ed5cd40d474e4ef18c899854b25e5070106504cb225e6d2c112d61a805e
      • cipher_text: 0102030405
      • blinded_node_pubkey: 0220293926219d8efe733336e2b674570dd96aa763acb3564e6e367b384d861a0a
      • cipher_text: 0504030201
      • blinded_node_pubkey: 02c75eb336a038294eaaf760158b2e851c3c0937262e35401ae64a1bee71a2e40c
      • cipher_text: 0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e
  • b: blinded path:
    • fee_base_msat: 4
    • fee_proportional_millionths: 2
    • cltv_expiry_delta: 10
    • htlc_minimum_msat: 0
    • htlc_maximum_msat: 10
    • flen: 0
    • first_ephemeral_blinding_point: 02c75eb336a038294eaaf760158b2e851c3c0937262e35401ae64a1bee71a2e40c
    • num_hops: 1
    • blinded_hops:
      • blinded_node_pubkey: 0220293926219d8efe733336e2b674570dd96aa763acb3564e6e367b384d861a0a
      • cipher_text: 0102030405

Size Restrictions

data_length Limit

In order to conform to any existing BOLT 11 invoice parser, each new tagged field must use the data_length encoding defined there. This means that the maximum size of any single encoded blinded path is 639 bytes.

What follows is a rough estimation of the maximum number of hops we can include in a single blinded path. It assumes that each hop's cipher text is the same length.

Cipher Text Size Estimation

First, a rough estimation of the average cipher text length is required. A forwarding node in a blinded path will receive a cipher text payload containing the following data:

  • padding: optional
  • short_channel_id of 8 bytes
  • payment_relay:
    • 2 byte cltv_expiry_delta
    • 4 byte fee_proportional_millionths
    • 4 byte fee_base_msat
  • payment_constraints:
    • 4 byte max_cltv_expiry
    • 8 byte htlc_minimum_msat
  • allowed_features: optional

If we assume that the allowed_features vector is not set, then this comes to a total of 30 mandatory bytes.

For the recipient node, it will receive a cipher text payload containing:

  • padding: optional
  • path_id: let's assume that this is 32 bytes like the existing payment address.
  • payment_constraints:
    • 4 byte max_cltv_expiry
    • 8 byte htlc_minimum_msat

This comes to a total of 44 bytes for the recipient's cipher text.

The padding field should be used by recipients to pad cipher text blobs so that all are the same size. Since the calculated recipient cipher text blob size (44) is larger than that of the forwarding nodes (30), we can assume that all the cipher text blobs will have a size of around 44 bytes.

blinded_hop Size Estimation

The total number of bytes required for a single blinded_hop is:

= 33+bigsize_len(cipher_text)+len(cipher_text)

If we use the estimated cipher_text size of 44 bytes, then bigsize_len(cipher_text) is 1 and so this comes to 78 bytes for a single blinded_hop.

blinded_payinfo Size Estimation

The total number of bytes required for the encoding of a single blinded_payinfo entry is:

= 4+4+2+8+8+2+len(features)+33+1+(num_hops*len(blinded_hop))
= 68+len(features)+(num_hops*len(blinded_hop))

If we take the estimate of 78 bytes per blinded_hop and if we assume an empty feature vector then this comes to:

= 68+(num_hops*78)

The maximum number of hops in a single blinded path can then be calculated to be:

639 = 68+(num_hops*78)
num_hops = 7

QR code limit

Another soft maximum value to keep in mind is the maximum number of bytes that can fit into a QR code which is 2,953 bytes. This is a soft maximum because this only applies if the invoice is in fact being transmitted via QR code. This limit does not apply if the invoice is being transmitted via other protocols such as LNURL. In the cases where the limit does apply, then two variables will be at play:

  • The number of blinded paths
  • The number of blinded hops within each path (which will always also be restricted by the data_length maximum).

The exact limit on the number of blinded paths that can be included depends on the size of other fields in the invoice. It is worth noting that an invoice with a blinded path should not contain any r (route hint) fields.