-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request: Allow a list of check-names. #35
Comments
Hi @JoelLefkowitz. I'll take a look. |
hey @matiasalbarello, thank you for coming back to the project :) I am actually leaving the company in a couple of months and will possibly have no time to keep maintaining this one (I haven't had any already, in months). would you like to take this repo up as a maintainer? For starters, would be great to actually release current master of course it's fine if you're taken up too, then we can keep looking for maintainers. |
I'm happy to be a maintainer too if you'd like |
That would be amazing. I will give you push access once I'm back at the computer. Super grateful there's interest to maintain this little project. |
Hi @progapandist. Thanks for the consideration. But given the time I could dedicate to this project, I think I'll keep being just a Collaborator. I'll try to be around more frequently though. |
@JoelLefkowitz, I just invited you as a maintainer, welcome to the project and feel free to discuss everything with @matiasalbarello who contributed a very big deal to this repo and has probably the most expert opinion on the current project structure |
Thanks @progapandist , will do. |
is it done? can we wait for one or more checks to complete? |
Currently you can specify a single job name with 'check-name' or you can wait for all checks to pass with 'running-workflow-name'. There are situations when you may want to wait for two jobs to complete in parallel before continuing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: