Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rigel units exhibit unreliable tracking compared to older gen sensor. #166

Open
cobrauf opened this issue Jun 8, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@cobrauf
Copy link

cobrauf commented Jun 8, 2018

Hi, I am not sure the best place to ask this, I tried Leap Motion forums but didn't get a helpful response.

I am developing a desktop experience using Unity. I've gotten good tracking with the gen 1 sensor so far, and have tried multiple gen 2 rigel sensors but couldn't get them to track correctly. My company wants to use gen 2 sensor for the wider field of view. Here's what I am seeing:

Gen 1:
Leap Diagnostic Visualizer: accurate, consistent tracking
Unity app: accurate, mostly consistent tracking

Gen 2:
Leap Diagnostic Visualizer: inconsistent tracking (visual fingers/hands will jump to random orientation)
Unity app: highly inaccurate and inconsistent tracking

Is gen 2 sensor supposed to work with the latest published software packages?

This is my set up:
Unity 2017.4
Leap Orion 3.2.1
Leap Unity Core Assets 4.3.4
Leap Hand Module 2.1.3
Leap Interaction Engine 1.1.1

thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant