You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
EPANET input files sometimes specifies pumps as constant power. This is nonphysical and will result in constant-valued objective functions (at least with respect to that pump). We can assume the specified power is the power at the BEP, but more information is needed to get flow and head at the BEP. It seems the way out is to run a few flow-feasibility simulations of the network and examine the flows through the pump.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The "Kentucky" test networks largely define pumps as constant power (POWER designation in the inp file). Kentucky network 3 (ky3.inp) seems to be the smallest.
EPANET input files sometimes specifies pumps as constant power. This is nonphysical and will result in constant-valued objective functions (at least with respect to that pump). We can assume the specified power is the power at the BEP, but more information is needed to get flow and head at the BEP. It seems the way out is to run a few flow-feasibility simulations of the network and examine the flows through the pump.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: