You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be interesting to be able to define control paths (as described in the STPA handbook). This is similar to the "operational processes", "functional chains" and "physical path" capabilities already in Capella. This would allow to more clearly associate control paths with scenarios, for instance and the other layers of the Arcadia methodology. Also, when the control diagram is heavily populated, it helps discern the control flow path, facilitating the analysis.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be interesting to be able to define control paths (as described in the STPA handbook). This is similar to the "operational processes", "functional chains" and "physical path" capabilities already in Capella. This would allow to more clearly associate control paths with scenarios, for instance and the other layers of the Arcadia methodology. Also, when the control diagram is heavily populated, it helps discern the control flow path, facilitating the analysis.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: