You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
wrap-body-with-msg-id does mostly the right thing - it puts on the prefix, but should treat the prefix entirely as a byte array (inclusive of the magic bits).
The publisher configuration has a serializer-fn to help with automatic serialization of published message bodies. Correspondingly, the consumer should have a deserialize function that allows the opposite action to take place.
At this time, split-body-and-msg-id stands in the way of that - because it always marshals the received message body into a string before stripping off the magic/msg-id/timestamp. It must do this without effecting the body's byte array and return the wrapped array unmodified (i.e. not transforming it to a string).
Kyle
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
wrap-body-with-msg-id does mostly the right thing - it puts on the prefix, but should treat the prefix entirely as a byte array (inclusive of the magic bits).
The publisher configuration has a serializer-fn to help with automatic serialization of published message bodies. Correspondingly, the consumer should have a deserialize function that allows the opposite action to take place.
At this time, split-body-and-msg-id stands in the way of that - because it always marshals the received message body into a string before stripping off the magic/msg-id/timestamp. It must do this without effecting the body's byte array and return the wrapped array unmodified (i.e. not transforming it to a string).
Kyle
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: