Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
240 lines (209 loc) · 11.1 KB

random-for-clones.md

File metadata and controls

240 lines (209 loc) · 11.1 KB

Entropy for Clones

This document provides a high level perspective on the implications of restoring multiple VM clones from a single snapshot. We start with an overview of the Linux random number generation (RNG) facilities, then go through the potential issues we’ve identified related to cloning state, and finally conclude with a series of recommendations. It’s worth stressing that we aim to prevent stale state being a problem only for the kernel interfaces. Some userspace applications or libraries keep their own equivalent of entropy pools and suffer from the same potential issues after being cloned. There is no generic solution under the current programming model, and all we can do is recommend against their use in pre-snapshot logic.

Background

The Linux kernel exposes three main RNG interfaces to userspace: the /dev/random and /dev/urandom special devices, and the getrandom syscall, which are described in the random(7) man page. Moreover, Firecracker supports the virtio-rng device which can provide additional entropy to guest VMs. It draws its random bytes from the aws-lc-rs crate which wraps the AWS-LC cryptographic library.

Traditionally, /dev/random has been considered a source of “true” randomness, with the downside that reads block when the pool of entropy gets depleted. On the other hand, /dev/urandom doesn’t block, but provides lower quality results. It turns out the distinction in output quality is actually very hard to make. According to this article, for kernel versions prior to 4.8, both devices draw their output from the same pool, with the exception that /dev/random will block when the system estimates the entropy count has decreased below a certain threshold. The /dev/urandom output is considered secure for virtually all purposes, with the caveat that using it before the system gathers sufficient entropy for initialization may indeed produce low quality random numbers. The getrandom syscall helps with this situation; it uses the /dev/urandom source by default, but will block until it gets properly initialized (the behavior can be altered via configuration flags).

Newer kernels (4.8+) have switched to an implementation where /dev/random output comes from a pool called the blocking pool, the output of /dev/urandom is given by a CSPRNG (cryptographically secure pseudorandom number generator), and there’s also an input pool which gathers entropy from various sources available on the system, and is used to feed into or seed the other two components. A very detailed description is available here.

The details of this newer implementation are used to make the recommendations present in the document. There are in-kernel interfaces used to obtain random numbers as well, but they are similar to using /dev/urandom (or getrandom with the default source) from userspace.

Whenever a VM clone is created based on a snapshot, execution resumes precisely from the previously saved state. Getting random bytes from either /dev/random or /dev/urandom does not lead to identical results for different clones created from the same snapshot because multiple parameters (such as timer data, or output from CPU HWRNG instructions which are present on Ivy Bridge or newer Intel processors and enabled in a Firecracker guest) are mixed with each result. Extra bits are mixed in both when reading random values, and in conjunction with entropy related events such as interrupts. Moreover, the guest kernel will eventually receive fresh entropy from virtio-rng, if attached. There are two questions here:

  • Is the CPU HWRNG output always mixed in when the feature is present (as opposed to only when the CPU HWRNG is trusted)?
  • Is the added noise strong enough to consider the final RNG output sufficiently divergent from all other clones?

Both these questions are particularly relevant immediately after resuming a VM from a snapshot. After the VM gets to run for a "sufficient" amount of time it should be able to gather some more entropy by itself and its state should be sufficiently divergent that of any other clones.

It seems the CPU HWRNG is always added to mix when present. More specifically, page 32 point 1 (at the top of the page) mentions using the CPU HWRNG when present for the entropy pool output function. Page 34 states in case a CPU random number generator is known to the Linux-RNG, data from that hardware RNG is mixed into the entropy pool in a second step. With respect to the initialization of the random pools and DRNG behind /dev/urandom. The discussion regarding DRNG state on page 35 mentions the key part, the counter, and the nonce are XORed with the output of the CPU random number generator if one is present. If it is not present, one high-resolution time stamp obtained with the kernel function random_get_entropy word is XORed with the key part. The CPU HWRNG is also used for the DRNG state transition function (as stated on page 36 point 1), and during the reseed operation (page 37 point 2). The document explicitly mentions when the CPU HWRNG has to be trusted (for example, the bullet points at the end of Section 3.3.2.3).

It’s not yet clear whether the noise that gets added for each clone post restore is sufficient to consider their RNG states distinct for security purposes. The conservative approach is to presume the stale state has a significant influence on RNG output, so we should reinitialize both sources based on fresh data after each restore. It would seem that simply writing data to /dev/urandom is enough to muddle the entropy pools, but the bits only get mixed with the input pool. It’s not certain at this point whether such writes have any immediate impact on the blocking pool, and it’s unlikely they cause the CSPRNG to be automatically reseeded.

The standard methods of interacting with the kernel RNG sources are documented in the random(4) man page. It states that any writes to either /dev/random or /dev/urandom are mixed with the input entropy pool, but do not increase the current entropy estimation. There is also an ioctl interface which, given the appropriate privileges, can be used to add data to the input entropy pool while also increasing the count, or completely empty all pools.

Init systems (such as systemd used by AL2 and other distros) might save a random seed file after boot. For systemd, the path is /var/lib/systemd/random-seed. Just to be on the safe side, any such file should be deleted before taking a snapshot, to prevent its reuse for any purposes by the guest. There’s also the /proc/sys/kernel/random/boot_id special file, which gets initialized with a random string at boot time, and is read-only afterwards. All clones restored from the same snapshot will implicitly read the same value from this file. If that’s not desirable, it’s possible to alter the read result via bind mounting another file on top of /proc/sys/kernel/random/boot_id.

Recommendations

  • Delete /var/lib/systemd/random-seed, or any equivalent files.
  • If changing the value present in /proc/sys/kernel/random/boot_id is important, bind mount another file on top of it.
  • If microVMs run on machines with IvyBridge or newer Intel processors (which provide RDRAND; in addition, RDSEED is offered starting with Broadwell). Hardware supported reseeding is done on a cadence defined by the Linux Kernel and should be sufficient for most cases.
  • Use virtio-rng. When present, the guest kernel uses the device as an additional source of entropy.
  • To be as safe as possible, the direct approach is to do the following (before customer code is resumed in the clone):
    1. Open one of the special devices files (either /dev/random or /dev/urandom). Take note that RNDCLEARPOOL no longer has any effect on the entropy pool.
    2. Issue an RNDADDENTROPY ioctl call (requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN) to mix the provided bytes into the input entropy pool and increase the entropy count. This should also cause the /dev/urandom CSPRNG to be reseeded. The bytes can be generated locally in the guest, or obtained from the host.
    3. Issue a RNDRESEEDCRNG ioctl call (4.14, 5.10, (requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) that specifically causes the CSPRNG to be reseeded from the input pool.

Annex 1 contains the source code of a C program which implements the previous three steps. As soon as the guest kernel version switches to 4.19 (or higher), we can rely on the CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_CPU kernel option (or the random.trust_cpu=on cmdline parameter) to have the entropy pool automatically refilled using the CPU HWRNG, so step 3 would no longer be necessary. Another way around step 3 is to attach a virtio-rng device. However, we cannot control when the guest kernel will request for random bytes from the device.

Annex 1: Source code that clears and reinitializes the entropy pool

#include <errno.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <linux/random.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>

void exit_usage() {
    printf("Usage: ./rerand [<hexadecimal_string>]\n"
           "The length of the string must be a multiple of 8.\n");
    exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}

void exit_perror(const char *msg) {
    perror(msg);
    exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}

int main(int argc, char ** argv) {
    if (argc > 2) {
        exit_usage();
    }

    size_t len = 0;
    struct rand_pool_info *info = NULL;

    if (argc == 2) {
        len = strlen(argv[1]);
        // We want len to be a multiple of 8 such that we have an easier time
        // parsing argv[1] into an array of u32s.
        if (len % 8) {
            exit_usage();
        }

        info = malloc(sizeof(struct rand_pool_info) + len / 8);
        if (info == NULL) {
            exit_perror("Could not alloc rand_pool_info struct");
        }
        // This is measured in bits IIRC.
        info->entropy_count = len * 4;
        info->buf_size = len / 8;
    }

    int fd = open("/dev/urandom", O_RDWR);
    if (fd < 0) {
        exit_perror("Unable to open /dev/urandom");
    }

    if (ioctl(fd, RNDCLEARPOOL) < 0) {
        exit_perror("Error issuing RNDCLEARPOOL operation");
    }

    if (argc == 1) {
        exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
    }

    // Add the entropy bytes supplied by the user.
    char num_buf[9] = {};
    size_t pos = 0;

    while (pos < len) {
        memcpy(num_buf, &argv[1] + pos, 8);
        info->buf[pos / 8] = strtoul(num_buf, NULL, 16);
        pos += 8;
    }

    if (ioctl(fd, RNDADDENTROPY, info) < 0) {
        exit_perror("Error issuing RNDADDENTROPY operation");
    }
}