You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
aja.js should also support the ES6 module syntax :
exportdefaultaja;
but we need to check how to know if ES6 modules are supported
---
Want to back this issue? **[Post a bounty on it!](https://www.bountysource.com/issues/7684511-support-es6-module?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F6332594&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github)** We accept bounties via [Bountysource](https://www.bountysource.com/?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F6332594&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I stumbled upon this repo looking for a es6 module I could use for http
calls. looking at the difficulty in detecting es6 support, Id suggest
writing aja in es6 and having a compiled es5 version. that way people can
browserify the es6 version (or what ever tool they use) and anyone else can
use the es5 version in the same way they currently are. That way you
wouldn't be maintaining 2 code bases and still offering es6 support? I'd be
happy to put in a pull request if you think it's the most reasonable
solution?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #6 (comment).
aja.js should also support the ES6 module syntax :
but we need to check how to know if ES6 modules are supported
--- Want to back this issue? **[Post a bounty on it!](https://www.bountysource.com/issues/7684511-support-es6-module?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F6332594&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github)** We accept bounties via [Bountysource](https://www.bountysource.com/?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F6332594&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: