Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: replaces proposalId for snapshotId in templates #59

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fcanela
Copy link
Contributor

@fcanela fcanela commented Oct 30, 2024

Changes proposalId for snapshotId as it is the identifier that readers expects

@fcanela fcanela self-assigned this Oct 30, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updating the email and notification templates to replace references to "Proposal ID" with "Snapshot ID." This modification affects the HTML, plain text, Slack, and Telegram templates, ensuring that notifications reflect the correct identifier associated with proposals. The overall structure and styling of the templates remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
templates/email/proposal-created-html.ejs Updated reference from <%- notification.event.proposalId %> to <%- notification.event.snapshotId %>.
templates/email/proposal-created-plain.ejs Changed "Proposal ID" from notification.event.proposalId to notification.event.snapshotId.
templates/slack/proposal-created.ejs Modified label from "Proposal ID" to "Snapshot ID" using <%- notification.event.proposalId %> to <%- notification.event.snapshotId %>.
templates/telegram/proposal-created.ejs Updated display from _Proposal ID_: <%- notification.event.proposalId %>toProposal ID: <%- notification.event.snapshotId %>.

Possibly related PRs

  • Fixes language in templates around proposals and answers #41: The changes in this PR also modify the templates/email/proposal-created-html.ejs and templates/email/proposal-created-plain.ejs files, updating the language around proposals to reflect a focus on "Reality Proposal Question," which is related to the changes in the main PR that updates the proposal ID to snapshot ID.
  • feat/extra details in emails #49: This PR enhances the notification system by integrating additional details from the LogNewProposal event, including the snapshotId, which aligns with the main PR's focus on changing the proposal ID to snapshot ID in email templates.

Suggested labels

Type: Feature🗿

Poem

In the land of proposals, so bright and so bold,
A snapshot emerged, a story retold.
From emails to Slack, the change took its flight,
With IDs now shining, all clear and all right.
Hooray for the updates, let’s hop and rejoice,
For snapshots are here, let’s all raise our voice! 🐇✨


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
templates/telegram/proposal-created.ejs (1)

8-8: Update the label to match the variable name change.

While the variable has been correctly updated to use snapshotId, the displayed label still shows "Proposal ID". For consistency, consider updating the label to "Snapshot ID" to match the new terminology.

-_Proposal ID_: `<%- notification.event.snapshotId %>`
+_Snapshot ID_: `<%- notification.event.snapshotId %>`
templates/slack/proposal-created.ejs (1)

8-8: Consider updating the label to match the identifier name.

While the change from proposalId to snapshotId is correct, consider updating the label from "Proposal ID" to "Snapshot ID" for consistency with the variable name change.

-_Proposal ID_: `<%- notification.event.snapshotId %>`
+_Snapshot ID_: `<%- notification.event.snapshotId %>`
templates/email/proposal-created-plain.ejs (1)

10-10: Update label to match the data source

While the variable has been correctly updated to use snapshotId, the label still reads "Proposal ID". To maintain consistency and avoid confusion, consider updating the label to "Snapshot ID".

-- Proposal ID: <%- notification.event.snapshotId %>
+- Snapshot ID: <%- notification.event.snapshotId %>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b4b8041 and 6d460b6.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • templates/email/proposal-created-html.ejs (1 hunks)
  • templates/email/proposal-created-plain.ejs (1 hunks)
  • templates/slack/proposal-created.ejs (1 hunks)
  • templates/telegram/proposal-created.ejs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
templates/email/proposal-created-html.ejs (2)

39-39: LGTM! Variable change aligns with PR objectives.

The update from proposalId to snapshotId is consistent with the PR's goal of standardizing identifier terminology across templates.


39-39: Verify data contract for notification.event.snapshotId.

Please ensure that the notification event object will consistently provide the snapshotId field to prevent potential undefined values in emails.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more specific information about the notification event structure and usage.


Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response since I have found clear evidence about the notification event structure and snapshotId field.

The snapshotId field is properly typed and guaranteed in notification events

The codebase shows that:

  • ProposalNotificationEvent type explicitly includes snapshotId through a Pick type from the Proposal type
  • AnswerNotificationEvent type also includes snapshotId through a Pick type from the Proposal type
  • Test mocks demonstrate that snapshotId is consistently included in event construction
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for notification event object construction to verify snapshotId assignment

# Test 1: Look for notification event object construction
rg -l "notification.event" --type ts --type js

# Test 2: Look for snapshotId assignments or types
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ { $$$snapshotId$$$}'

Length of output: 275


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for notification event type definitions and construction
rg -A 10 "notification.event|NotificationEvent|interface.*Event" --type ts

# Look specifically for snapshotId usage in notification context
rg -A 5 "snapshotId.*notification|notification.*snapshotId" --type ts --type js

# Check the notification creation/sending logic
rg -A 10 "createNotification|sendNotification" --type ts

Length of output: 8664

Copy link

@wadader wadader left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

I can see one reference remaining in

event.proposalId: <%- notification.event.proposalId %>

I am not too sure of what the file is?
Does it need to be updated or is it alright?

@fcanela
Copy link
Contributor Author

fcanela commented Nov 4, 2024

@wadader that was intended. That template is just validating the fields injected/available to the templates. It is not used outside testing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants