-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: replaces proposalId for snapshotId in templates #59
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updating the email and notification templates to replace references to "Proposal ID" with "Snapshot ID." This modification affects the HTML, plain text, Slack, and Telegram templates, ensuring that notifications reflect the correct identifier associated with proposals. The overall structure and styling of the templates remain unchanged. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
templates/telegram/proposal-created.ejs (1)
8-8
: Update the label to match the variable name change.
While the variable has been correctly updated to use snapshotId
, the displayed label still shows "Proposal ID". For consistency, consider updating the label to "Snapshot ID" to match the new terminology.
-_Proposal ID_: `<%- notification.event.snapshotId %>`
+_Snapshot ID_: `<%- notification.event.snapshotId %>`
templates/slack/proposal-created.ejs (1)
8-8
: Consider updating the label to match the identifier name.
While the change from proposalId
to snapshotId
is correct, consider updating the label from "Proposal ID" to "Snapshot ID" for consistency with the variable name change.
-_Proposal ID_: `<%- notification.event.snapshotId %>`
+_Snapshot ID_: `<%- notification.event.snapshotId %>`
templates/email/proposal-created-plain.ejs (1)
10-10
: Update label to match the data source
While the variable has been correctly updated to use snapshotId
, the label still reads "Proposal ID". To maintain consistency and avoid confusion, consider updating the label to "Snapshot ID".
-- Proposal ID: <%- notification.event.snapshotId %>
+- Snapshot ID: <%- notification.event.snapshotId %>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- templates/email/proposal-created-html.ejs (1 hunks)
- templates/email/proposal-created-plain.ejs (1 hunks)
- templates/slack/proposal-created.ejs (1 hunks)
- templates/telegram/proposal-created.ejs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
templates/email/proposal-created-html.ejs (2)
39-39
: LGTM! Variable change aligns with PR objectives.
The update from proposalId
to snapshotId
is consistent with the PR's goal of standardizing identifier terminology across templates.
39-39
: Verify data contract for notification.event.snapshotId.
Please ensure that the notification event object will consistently provide the snapshotId
field to prevent potential undefined values in emails.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the notification event structure and usage.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response since I have found clear evidence about the notification event structure and snapshotId field.
The snapshotId
field is properly typed and guaranteed in notification events
The codebase shows that:
ProposalNotificationEvent
type explicitly includessnapshotId
through a Pick type from the Proposal typeAnswerNotificationEvent
type also includessnapshotId
through a Pick type from the Proposal type- Test mocks demonstrate that
snapshotId
is consistently included in event construction
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for notification event object construction to verify snapshotId assignment
# Test 1: Look for notification event object construction
rg -l "notification.event" --type ts --type js
# Test 2: Look for snapshotId assignments or types
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ { $$$snapshotId$$$}'
Length of output: 275
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for notification event type definitions and construction
rg -A 10 "notification.event|NotificationEvent|interface.*Event" --type ts
# Look specifically for snapshotId usage in notification context
rg -A 5 "snapshotId.*notification|notification.*snapshotId" --type ts --type js
# Check the notification creation/sending logic
rg -A 10 "createNotification|sendNotification" --type ts
Length of output: 8664
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
I can see one reference remaining in
event.proposalId: <%- notification.event.proposalId %> |
I am not too sure of what the file is?
Does it need to be updated or is it alright?
@wadader that was intended. That template is just validating the fields injected/available to the templates. It is not used outside testing. |
Changes proposalId for snapshotId as it is the identifier that readers expects