You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
This is subjective, but I think it's fair to say LASFile.read is too slow. Compared to the performance that parsing a similarly-sized table using pandas.read_csv, it is very obviously slow. One of the big problems in improving this is the lack of reliable benchmarks to ensure we are improving performance.
Describe the solution you'd like
A simple way to see the performance of LASFile.read for one branch compared to another branch, in a reliable way. Then we can try out different code in attempts to improve the performance and see whether we're getting anywhere!
Describe alternatives you've considered
I've tried doing profiling locally but I've found depending on what else is happening on my machine at the time, the speeds vary quite widely. I also have no experience in setting up this kind of thing so am keen for any ideas.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
This is subjective, but I think it's fair to say
LASFile.read
is too slow. Compared to the performance that parsing a similarly-sized table usingpandas.read_csv
, it is very obviously slow. One of the big problems in improving this is the lack of reliable benchmarks to ensure we are improving performance.Describe the solution you'd like
A simple way to see the performance of
LASFile.read
for one branch compared to another branch, in a reliable way. Then we can try out different code in attempts to improve the performance and see whether we're getting anywhere!Describe alternatives you've considered
I've tried doing profiling locally but I've found depending on what else is happening on my machine at the time, the speeds vary quite widely. I also have no experience in setting up this kind of thing so am keen for any ideas.
** Solution **
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: