Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Protocol in markdown #117

Open
4 tasks done
alistairewj opened this issue Sep 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
4 tasks done

Protocol in markdown #117

alistairewj opened this issue Sep 8, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@alistairewj
Copy link
Contributor

alistairewj commented Sep 8, 2023

For the v1 of the protocol in markdown, we want:

@alistairewj
Copy link
Contributor Author

alistairewj commented Oct 3, 2023

Additional tasks

  • SurveyCompletion - who is completing the survey
  • EligibleStudies - study the individual will enroll in (currently a broken link - Questionnaire-EligibleStudies.html)
  • Consent
    • questionnaires exist but links might need fixing in protocol.md
    • Questionnaire-MainICF.html
    • Questionnaire-MainICFResearcherStatement.html
    • Questionnaire-MainICFCombinedPDF.html
    • Questionnaire-AddendumWCM.html
    • Questionnaire-AddendumWCMResearcherStatement.html
    • Questionnaire-AddendumCombinedPDF.html
    • these questionnaires look like they need cleaning up - lots of ambiguously named attributes
  • Acoustic Tasks
    • The existing plan definition needs to be converted into a Questionnaire. Audio completions are attachments.
    • PlanDefinition-VbaiPlanDefinitionAcousticTasksGeneralExample.html
  • Mood acoustic tasks - convert the current text into a questionnaire resource
  • Voice acoustic tasks - convert the current text into a questionnaire resource
  • Pediatric acoustic tasks - convert the current text into a questionnaire resource
  • Respiratory acoustic tasks - convert the current text into a questionnaire resource

questions for the team

  • Should confounders be asked before the acoustic task? Need to ask Teaming core.
  • Do we actually need cohort specific confounders, if we redefine confounders to be "session specific confounders for acoustics?". Argument is we would want to collect it for everyone.
  • Need to figure out how we are handling session ID. I believe it does not go in the questionnaire at all, and is metadata collected around the questionnaire.

typo Voice "PatientQueestionnaire"
serverity in one of the filenames

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant