Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluation results #10

Open
Sharpiless opened this issue Jun 27, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Evaluation results #10

Sharpiless opened this issue Jun 27, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@Sharpiless
Copy link

python test_scripts/BI/REDS/test_IART_REDS4_N16.py

2024-06-27 16:32:08,597 INFO: Average PSNR: 32.303768 dB for 30 clips. 
2024-06-27 16:32:08,597 INFO: Average SSIM: 0.899245  for 30 clips. 

Awesome work! But i get 32.30 on REDS, which mismatches the results in the paper. Any suggestions?

@kai422
Copy link
Owner

kai422 commented Jun 28, 2024

Hi,

Can you check if your cuda version is 11? I found this affected the testing results in my side.

Regards,
Kai

@Sharpiless
Copy link
Author

Hi, thanks for reply! I'm using python3.8 pytorch 1.13.1+cu117 (system cuda 11.3) and 4090 gpus. I'll check it on another machine,

@xinyuliu-jeffrey
Copy link

xinyuliu-jeffrey commented Jul 17, 2024

On python 3.9 + cuda 12.2, the results match the results for the "python test_IART_REDS4_N16.py"

2024-07-17 10:36:10,772 INFO: Average PSNR: 32.899396 dB for 4 clips.
2024-07-17 10:36:10,772 INFO: Average SSIM: 0.913785 for 4 clips.

However I wonder if the table means two different models are used, with the REDS_N16 model evaluated on REDS4, and the finetuned Vimeo model evaluated on Vimeo-90K-T and Vid4. That is, the IA-CNN for Vimeo and Vid4 evaluation is finetuned from the N15 model trained on REDS?
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants