You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi. I was wondering if by referencing the Standard.Licensing nuget package, it is possible for a "customer" to circumvent the licence validation by replacing the original Standard.Licensing.dll with a dummy version of it, that implements the same interfaces, classes and public methods but doesn't validate anything.
In order to make sure this doesn't happen, I consider including in my core project the classes that are in the Validation folder. Do you agree this is a good approach?
Thank you so much.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi. I was wondering if by referencing the Standard.Licensing nuget package, it is possible for a "customer" to circumvent the licence validation by replacing the original
Standard.Licensing.dll
with a dummy version of it, that implements the same interfaces, classes and public methods but doesn't validate anything.In order to make sure this doesn't happen, I consider including in my core project the classes that are in the Validation folder. Do you agree this is a good approach?
Thank you so much.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: