Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[docs] Benchmark uses unoptimized EFS mount options #5237

Open
Atry opened this issue Oct 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[docs] Benchmark uses unoptimized EFS mount options #5237

Atry opened this issue Oct 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
area/third-party Issues or PRs related to third party product or project kind/documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@Atry
Copy link

Atry commented Oct 20, 2024

What happened:
here:

mount -t nfs -o nfsvers=4.1,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,hard,timeo=600,retrans=2,noresvport, <EFS-ID>.efs.<REGION>.amazonaws.com:/ /efs

nconnect is not specified, while in Amazon EFS performance tips, nconnect=64 or more is recommended for high IOPS

What you expected to happen:
The mount option should be optimized according to Amazon EFS performance tips

How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):
Visit https://juicefs.com/docs/community/mdtest/

Anything else we need to know?
I hope the benchmark could be more convincing

Environment:
N/A

@Atry Atry added the kind/bug Something isn't working label Oct 20, 2024
@zhijian-pro zhijian-pro removed the kind/bug Something isn't working label Oct 21, 2024
@jiefenghuang jiefenghuang added kind/documentation Improvements or additions to documentation area/third-party Issues or PRs related to third party product or project labels Oct 21, 2024
@jiefenghuang
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your feedback, we will look into the issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/third-party Issues or PRs related to third party product or project kind/documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants