You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that on my HPC the diamond step of orthofinder takes forever for the octoploid species with ~100k gene models being BLASTed against itself.
My workaround was (1) manually running the exact diamond command in the orthofinder WorkingDirectory providing more --threads to it and then (2) killing the original diamond processes. Then, everything gets through very quickly and orthofinder does not notice the interception :)
But I think there might be a nicer way to provide more threads per diamond run. I haven't found one neither in GENESPACE nor in orthofinder — should I go down to orthofinder issues then?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
thanks for this suggestion. This is a feature that was part of an earlier GENESPACE release (to allow parallelization within blast runs, instead of only among). I removed it at v1 to reduce the chances for compute architecture conflict.
You can definitely run orthofinder separately, and if you set -op, then alter the number of threads in those blast commands and run them separately.
This would save substantial time when running a couple very large genomes, but will have little savings once the number of blast jobs significantly exceeds the number of cores.
I noticed that on my HPC the
diamond
step oforthofinder
takes forever for the octoploid species with ~100k gene models being BLASTed against itself.My workaround was (1) manually running the exact
diamond
command in the orthofinderWorkingDirectory
providing more--threads
to it and then (2) killing the originaldiamond
processes. Then, everything gets through very quickly andorthofinder
does not notice the interception :)But I think there might be a nicer way to provide more threads per
diamond
run. I haven't found one neither inGENESPACE
nor inorthofinder
— should I go down toorthofinder
issues then?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: